On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Lyu Mitnick wrote:
> Hello Stefan, Kevin
> I don't want to diversify my GSoC applications. I thought I should do my
> best of
> supporting fully VHD and add asynchronous io into block/vpc.c via
> coroutines. I
> noticed that there is "splitting hard disk images" fea
Thanks for the report.
For the second part, you need to clone using the git protocol (git clone
git://git.qemu.org/qemu.git
as shown in http://wiki.qemu.org/Download#Latest_Source_Code). The http bit
appears broken for now.
I'm not sure about the first part yet - certainly trying a more recent
Thanks for the report.
Can you tell me if it works with a Linux guest?
Can you tell me what kind of camera it is (e.g. the descriptors from
lsusb -v for the device)?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu-
devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU.
https://bugs.launc
On 04/05/2011 02:55 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Stefan Berger
wrote:
On 04/05/2011 01:45 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Stefan Berger
wrote:
On 04/03/2011 05:20 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Stefan Berger
wr
Looks like this is fixed in qemu.
** Changed in: qemu
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu-
devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521994
Title:
Windows 98 doesn't detect mouse on qemu
Le mardi 05 avril 2011 à 22:54 +0100, Peter Maydell a écrit :
> On 5 April 2011 22:48, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> > Le lundi 04 avril 2011 à 12:09 +0100, Peter Maydell a écrit :
> >> -#if defined(TARGET_SPARC) || defined(TARGET_S390X)
> >> +#if defined(CONFIG_SOFTFLOAT)
> >
> > Why don't you use "#if
On 5 April 2011 22:48, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Le lundi 04 avril 2011 à 12:09 +0100, Peter Maydell a écrit :
>> -#if defined(TARGET_SPARC) || defined(TARGET_S390X)
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_SOFTFLOAT)
>
> Why don't you use "#if defined(FLOAT128)" ?
I did consider that, but I felt FLOAT128 was a soft
Le lundi 04 avril 2011 à 12:09 +0100, Peter Maydell a écrit :
> CPU_QuadU isn't used on all targets, but there's no harm in defining the
> typedef anyway. It only needs to be guarded by CONFIG_SOFTFLOAT, because
> softfloat-native doesn't have a float128 type. This avoids the need for
> every new t
On 5 April 2011 21:29, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 04/05/2011 01:55 PM, Brian Wheeler wrote:
>>
>> I'm trying to disable the ps/2 mouse in favor of the serial mouse
>> provided by -chardev msmouse since the ps/2 mouse has had lots of
>> problems with older OSes (OpenStep, OS/2, Win 3.1, etc). I'v
On 04/05/2011 01:44 PM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
On 04/05/2011 03:25 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 13:08 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 04/05/2011 12:08 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
The thing about WHQL is that it has its own test suite coordination
program (DTM), that has to r
On 04/05/2011 03:25 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 5 April 2011 14:14, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
This stems from the fact that development is centered around the
mailing list. Some folks have put technical documentation on the wiki
but a lot simply happens on the mailing list.
I'm unsure how we can
On 04/05/2011 01:55 PM, Brian Wheeler wrote:
I'm trying to disable the ps/2 mouse in favor of the serial mouse
provided by -chardev msmouse since the ps/2 mouse has had lots of
problems with older OSes (OpenStep, OS/2, Win 3.1, etc). I've got a
couple of questions:
1) If I change a VMState some
On 5 April 2011 14:14, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> This stems from the fact that development is centered around the
> mailing list. Some folks have put technical documentation on the wiki
> but a lot simply happens on the mailing list.
> I'm unsure how we can sustainably keep the wiki up-to-date on
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 14:55 -0400, Brian Wheeler wrote:
> I'm trying to disable the ps/2 mouse in favor of the serial mouse
> provided by -chardev msmouse since the ps/2 mouse has had lots of
> problems with older OSes (OpenStep, OS/2, Win 3.1, etc). I've got a
> couple of questions:
>
> 1) If I
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Stefan Berger
wrote:
> On 04/05/2011 01:45 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Stefan Berger
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 04/03/2011 05:20 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Stefan Berger
wrote:
>
> On
I'm trying to disable the ps/2 mouse in favor of the serial mouse
provided by -chardev msmouse since the ps/2 mouse has had lots of
problems with older OSes (OpenStep, OS/2, Win 3.1, etc). I've got a
couple of questions:
1) If I change a VMState something by appending a field (i.e.
"unplugged"),
This patch almost rewrites acpi_table_add() function
(but still leaves it using old get_param_value() interface).
The result is that it's now possible to specify whole table
(together with a header) in an external file, instead of just
data portion, with a new file= parameter, but at the same time
On 04/05/2011 03:25 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 13:08 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 04/05/2011 12:08 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
The thing about WHQL is that it has its own test suite coordination
program (DTM), that has to run on a separate machine/VM. So they have
al
On 04/05/2011 01:25 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 13:08 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 04/05/2011 12:08 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
The thing about WHQL is that it has its own test suite coordination
program (DTM), that has to run on a separate machine/VM. So they have
al
On 04/05/2011 01:45 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Stefan Berger
wrote:
On 04/03/2011 05:20 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Stefan Berger
wrote:
On 04/01/2011 02:14 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
At this point there is no compile test needed since al
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 13:08 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 04/05/2011 12:08 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
> >
> >> The thing about WHQL is that it has its own test suite coordination
> >> program (DTM), that has to run on a separate machine/VM. So they have
> >> all infrastructure in place there. If we
On 04/03/2011 03:31 AM, Avishay Traeger wrote:
Revised patch for improving the accuracy of the block migration bandwidth
calculation. Thanks a lot to Michael Roth for the input.
For those that missed the original patch, here is the description:
block_mig_state.total_time is currently the sum o
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Stefan Berger
wrote:
> This patch adds an optional test suite (CONFIG_TIS_TEST) for the TIS interface
> to SeaBIOS. If compiled into the BIOS, it can be invoked through the
> TPM-specific menu item 8.
>
> 1. Enable TPM
> 2. Disable TPM
> 3. Activate TPM
> 4. Deactiv
On 04/05/2011 12:08 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
The thing about WHQL is that it has its own test suite coordination
program (DTM), that has to run on a separate machine/VM. So they have
all infrastructure in place there. If we need graphical clients being
started and controlled on a linux bare metal m
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 04/04/2011 08:02 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> > On 04/04/2011 07:22 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 04/04/2011 10:59 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Apr 04,
Hello Stefan, Kevin
I don't want to diversify my GSoC applications. I thought I should do my
best of
supporting fully VHD and add asynchronous io into block/vpc.c via
coroutines. I
noticed that there is "splitting hard disk images" feature in VHD
specification. I
have take a look of block/raw-win3
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 20:08 +0300, Alon Levy wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 01:27:48PM -0300, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 19:01 +0300, Alon Levy wrote:
>
> > > So I was basically talking about the added requirement of creating a
> > > client
> > > connection (one or
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 12:05:08AM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 08:02:23PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Avi Kivity
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Stefan Berger
wrote:
> On 04/03/2011 05:20 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Stefan Berger
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 04/01/2011 02:14 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>>
>>> At this point there is no compile test needed since all code is 'there'.
>>> I
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 16:29 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> Features that I think are important for a qemu.git kvm-autotest:
> * Public results display (sounds like you're working on this)
^ Yes, we hope to get this setup soon.
> * Public notifications of breakage, qemu.git/master failures to
>
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 01:27:48PM -0300, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 19:01 +0300, Alon Levy wrote:
> > screenshots are already there, and they are a great start. But you can't
> > really do testing if you aren't recreating the same environment, and having
> > a client s
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 19:01 +0300, Alon Levy wrote:
> screenshots are already there, and they are a great start. But you can't
> really do testing if you aren't recreating the same environment, and having
> a client server where there is no client, while being a good test, doesn't
> cover the case
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 08:07:03AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
[snip]
> kvm-autotest
> - roadmap...refactor to centralize testing (handle the xen-autotest split off)
> - internally at RH, lmr and cleber maintain autotest server to test
> branches (testing qemu.git daily)
> - have good automation
On 04/04/11 21:52, Brian Wheeler wrote:
Booting AIX 5.2 gives me
---
Welcome to AIX.
boot image timestamp: 70:80 15/C0
The current time and date
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
> kvm-autotest
> - roadmap...refactor to centralize testing (handle the xen-autotest split off)
> - internally at RH, lmr and cleber maintain autotest server to test
> branches (testing qemu.git daily)
> - have good automation for installs and
KVM Forum
- save the date is out, cfp will follow later this week
- abstracts due in 6wks, 2wk review period, notifications by end of May
Improving process to scale project
- Trivial patch bot
- Sub-maintainership
Trivial patch monkeys^Wteam
- small/simple patches posted can fall through the crac
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 20:15:30 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Is it really safe ignoring write to this register? If yes, it's probably
> a good idea to explain why in a comment. In any case, if supporting this
> register is easy to do, it would be the best option.
I think it is safe. Please see an
Fedora 14
- We have 103 open bugs, 16 of which have fixes in awaiting updates.
- 1 bugs have been closed in the last week
Fedora 15
- Upcoming Deadlines:
2011-04-05 Beta Change Deadline Features 100% Complete *today*
2011-04-19 Beta Release
2011-05-09 Final Change Deadline
2011-05-10 C
Am 05.04.2011 07:07, schrieb David Gibson:
> From: Ben Herrenschmidt
>
> scsi-generic scsi_read_complete() should not -both- call the client
> complete callback with SCSI_REASON_DATA -and- call
> scsi_command_complete(). The former will cause the client to queue a
> new read or write request, wh
On 04/05/2011 03:16 PM, David Gibson wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 10:05:12AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 05.04.2011, at 07:12, David Gibson wrote:
[snip]
+struct icp_state *xics_system_init(int nr_irqs)
{
+CPUState *env;
+int max_server_num;
int i;
struct icp_state *icp
Dear Qemu developers,
First, I'd like to reintroduce myself, as my university and official
duties prevented me from being active in the community since last year.
I am Roland Elek, a student from Hungary, and a successful student
participant of Google Summer of Code 2010. This year, I would li
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:49 PM, Lluís wrote:
> This patch defines the "disable" trace event state to always use the "nop"
> backend.
>
> As a side-effect, all events are now enabled (without "disable") by default,
> as
> all backends (except "stderr") have programmatic support for dynamically
>
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 10:05:12AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 05.04.2011, at 07:12, David Gibson wrote:
[snip]
> > +struct icp_state *xics_system_init(int nr_irqs)
> > {
> > +CPUState *env;
> > +int max_server_num;
> > int i;
> > struct icp_state *icp;
> > struct ics_stat
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Brad Hards wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 06:29:48 pm Alexander Graf wrote:
>> > quality and resubmission. It would also help to have some explanatory
>> > text for some of the architectural docs that are available (e.g. there
>> > is a lot of words on the wiki about Q
Am 31.03.2011 15:52, schrieb Avishay Traeger:
>
> block_mig_state.reads is an int, and multiplying by BLOCK_SIZE yielded a
> negative number, resulting in a negative bandwidth (running on a 32-bit
> machine). Cast to avoid.
>
> Signed-off-by: Avishay Traeger
This patch is corrupted by line wra
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:42 AM, David Ahern wrote:
> On 04/04/11 23:33, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:54 PM, David Ahern wrote:
>>> On 04/04/11 07:38, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 04/04/2011 08:22 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 04/03/2011 02:57 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 06:29:48 pm Alexander Graf wrote:
> > quality and resubmission. It would also help to have some explanatory
> > text for some of the architectural docs that are available (e.g. there
> > is a lot of words on the wiki about QED, and I guess its some kind of
> > storage / disk thin
This patch implements the main part of the TCG BIOS extensions. It provides
the following functionality:
- initialization of the TCPA ACPI table used for logging of measurements
- initialization of the TPM by sending a sequence of commands to it
- proper setup of the TPM once the BIOS hands over c
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Harsh Prateek Bora
wrote:
> The nwnames field in TWALK message is assumed to be >=0 and <= MAXWELEM
> which is defined as macro P9_MAXWELEM (16) in virtio-9p.h as per 9p2000
> RFC. Appropriate changes are required in V9fsWalkState and v9fs_walk.
>
> v4:
>
This patch provides ACPI support for the TPM device. It probes for the TPM
device and only if a TPM device is found then the TPM's SSDT and TCPA table
are created. This patch also connects them to the RSDT.
Since the logging area in the TCPA table requires 64kb, the memory reserved
for ACPI tables
This patch adds an optional test suite (CONFIG_TIS_TEST) for the TIS interface
to SeaBIOS. If compiled into the BIOS, it can be invoked through the
TPM-specific menu item 8.
1. Enable TPM
2. Disable TPM
3. Activate TPM
4. Deactivate TPM
5. Clear ownership
6. Allow installation of owner
7. Prevent
This patch implements the TCG BIOS interrupt handler 1ah. It is for
example used by trusted grub.
This patch adds an implementation of SHA1 (following NIST specs., IETF RFC 3147
and Wikipedia) for speeding up measurements of code. Trusted Grub for example
makes use of this interface and measures (
This patch adds invocactions of functions that measure various parts of the
code and data through various parts of the BIOS code. It follows TCG
specifications on what needs to be measured. It also adds the implementation
of the called functions.
Reference for what needs to be measured can be foun
The following set of patches add TPM and Trusted Computing support to SeaBIOS.
In particular the patches add:
- a TPM driver for the Qemu's TPM TIS emulation (not yet in Qemu git)
- ACPI support for the TPM device (SSDT table)
- ACPI support for measurement logging (TCPA table)
- Support for initi
This patch provides an addtional menu entry that enables the user to control
certain aspects of the TPM.
If a working TPM has been detected, the top level BIOS menu
will look like this:
Press F12 for boot menu.
Press F11 to TPM menu.
Upon pressing F11 the TPM menu will be shown:
1. Enable TPM
2
This patch adds an implementation of a TPM TIS driver for the TPM TIS
emulation supported by Qemu (patches posted, not in git yet). Usage of the
driver is broken up into several functions. The driver is cleanly separated
from the rest of the code through an interface holding pointers to the driver'
This patch adds a global get_rsdp() function call and refactors
find_resume_vector() to call it.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger
---
src/acpi.c | 12 ++--
src/acpi.h |1 +
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: seabios/src/acpi.c
===
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 08:53:21 pm Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> scripts/checkpatch.pl is mentioned in CODING_STYLE. I have a git-hook
> to automatically run it:
> http://blog.vmsplice.net/2011/03/how-to-automatically-run-checkpatchpl.html
>
> That hook is just a personal tool I use. It is not required b
Hi,
While experimenting with some odd stuff I ran into trouble when
registering the entire address space. The following patch
fixes the problem for me.
Cheers
commit f9a9a0d305ff774efd289ab88be427d1da05edfb
Author: Edgar E. Iglesias
Date: Tue Apr 5 13:00:36 2011 +0200
exec: Handle regist
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Brad Hards wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 06:29:48 pm Alexander Graf wrote:
>> What exactly do you mean by better-practice git setups?
> Some projects try to use special features in git. For example, KDE makes use
> of insteadOf and pushInsteadOf to allow checking out
The nwnames field in TWALK message is assumed to be >=0 and <= MAXWELEM
which is defined as macro P9_MAXWELEM (16) in virtio-9p.h as per 9p2000
RFC. Appropriate changes are required in V9fsWalkState and v9fs_walk.
v4:
- rebased on mainline repo, else condition updated as required.
v3:
On 04/05/2011 02:24 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Harsh Prateek Bora
wrote:
The nwnames field in TWALK message is assumed to be>=0 and<= MAXWELEM
which is defined as macro P9_MAXWELEM (16) in virtio-9p.h as per 9p2000
RFC. Appropriate changes are required in V9fsWa
On 05.04.2011, at 11:44, Brad Hards wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 06:29:48 pm Alexander Graf wrote:
>> What exactly do you mean by better-practice git setups?
> Some projects try to use special features in git. For example, KDE makes use
> of insteadOf and pushInsteadOf to allow checking out from
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 06:29:48 pm Alexander Graf wrote:
> What exactly do you mean by better-practice git setups?
Some projects try to use special features in git. For example, KDE makes use
of insteadOf and pushInsteadOf to allow checking out from anongit, and
committing to the main server using a
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 02:59:27PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 04/04/2011 02:22 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >Please, send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>
> - KVM Forum -- do we have an ETA on CFP?
>
> - Sub-maintainership -- how we can expand and improve upon it
>
> -
On (Tue) 05 Apr 2011 [12:17:30], Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 04/05/2011 12:12 PM, Amit Shah wrote:
> >On (Tue) 05 Apr 2011 [12:00:38], Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> On 04/05/2011 11:09 AM, Amit Shah wrote:
> >> >On (Tue) 05 Apr 2011 [10:48:16], Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> >> On 04/05/2011 09:41 AM, Amit Shah w
On 04/05/2011 12:12 PM, Amit Shah wrote:
On (Tue) 05 Apr 2011 [12:00:38], Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 04/05/2011 11:09 AM, Amit Shah wrote:
> >On (Tue) 05 Apr 2011 [10:48:16], Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> On 04/05/2011 09:41 AM, Amit Shah wrote:
> >> >See http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg5
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Lyu Mitnick wrote:
> Hello all,
> Looking at QEMU'w wiki I saw the "QCOW2 <- > QED image converter", that I
> am
> also interested to work as student and apply for GSoC 2011. I have study
> the
> specifications of the two images and have some idea about
> implementa
On (Tue) 05 Apr 2011 [12:00:38], Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 04/05/2011 11:09 AM, Amit Shah wrote:
> >On (Tue) 05 Apr 2011 [10:48:16], Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> On 04/05/2011 09:41 AM, Amit Shah wrote:
> >> >See http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg51504.html
> >>
> >> I see this is quite fresh.
On 04/05/2011 11:09 AM, Amit Shah wrote:
On (Tue) 05 Apr 2011 [10:48:16], Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 04/05/2011 09:41 AM, Amit Shah wrote:
> >See http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg51504.html
>
> I see this is quite fresh. What are the plans here?
We're still discussing where the fix sho
On (Tue) 05 Apr 2011 [09:40:05], Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > See http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg51504.html
>
> I don't think that patch updates the block inode size. We'd need to
> call fs/block_dev.c:revalidate_disk() instead of directly calling
> cdi->disk->fops->revalidate_disk(cdi-
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Harsh Prateek Bora
wrote:
> The nwnames field in TWALK message is assumed to be >=0 and <= MAXWELEM
> which is defined as macro P9_MAXWELEM (16) in virtio-9p.h as per 9p2000
> RFC. Appropriate changes are required in V9fsWalkState and v9fs_walk.
>
> v3:
> - Updated
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 05.04.2011, at 08:01, Brad Hards wrote:
>
> On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 05:59:27 am Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
> - Trivial patch monkeys^Wteam -- this is an idea Stefan and I have been
>
> kicking around to help some of the trivial patches get more
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:41 AM, Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Mon) 04 Apr 2011 [16:09:05], Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> > On 04/04/2011 04:38 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 04/04/2011 08:22 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> On 04/03/2011 02:
On 05.04.2011, at 08:01, Brad Hards wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 05:59:27 am Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> - Trivial patch monkeys^Wteam -- this is an idea Stefan and I have been
>> kicking around to help some of the trivial patches get more attention on
>> the mailing list
> I saw a wiki page (http:/
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Brad Hards wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 05:59:27 am Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> - Trivial patch monkeys^Wteam -- this is an idea Stefan and I have been
>> kicking around to help some of the trivial patches get more attention on
>> the mailing list
> I saw a wiki page (
On (Tue) 05 Apr 2011 [10:48:16], Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 04/05/2011 09:41 AM, Amit Shah wrote:
> >See http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg51504.html
>
> I see this is quite fresh. What are the plans here?
We're still discussing where the fix should be, but it certainly is a
kernel bug and
On 05.04.2011, at 07:12, David Gibson wrote:
> Currently the pseries machine init code builds up an array, envs, of
> CPUState pointers for all the cpus in the system. This is kind of
> pointless, given the generic code already has a perfectly good linked list
> of the cpus.
>
> In addition, th
On 05.04.2011, at 07:04, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 14:14 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ static int vscsi_srp_direct_data(VSCSIState *s,
>> vscsi_req *req,
{
struct srp_direct_buf *md = req->cur_desc;
uint32_t llen;
-
On 05.04.2011, at 06:54, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 04:32:24PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> With the s390x target we use the deposit instruction to store 32bit values
>> into 64bit registers without clobbering the upper 32 bits.
>>
>> This specific operation can be optimi
On 04/05/2011 09:41 AM, Amit Shah wrote:
See http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg51504.html
I see this is quite fresh. What are the plans here?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
On 04/04/2011 08:02 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 04/04/2011 07:22 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>> On 04/04/2011 10:59 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 06:27:57PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
Many PCI BARs tha
82 matches
Mail list logo
