niques for memory ordering if negotiated.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets
---
Note: Patch to change the name of the feature from VIRTIO_F_IO_BARRIER
to VIRTIO_F_ORDER_PLATFORM is not merged yet:
https://www.mail-archive.com/virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org/msg04114.html
Patch for DPDK vir
So, can we have any conclusion about this patch and the series?
Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
On 05.01.2019 5:43, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 04:48:23PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>> On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 13:29:19 +0300
>> Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>
>>
On 16.01.2019 15:26, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Ed Maste writes:
>
>> From: Ed Maste
>>
>> Cirrus-CI (https://cirrus-ci.org) is a hosted CI service which supports
>> several platforms, including FreeBSD. Later on we could build for other
>> hosts in Cirrus-CI, but I'm starting with only FreeBSD as
On 16.01.2019 18:30, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 07:49:36AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 02:09:11PM +0300, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>> On 11.12.2018 13:53, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Let&
On 16.01.2019 18:48, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 06:46:39PM +0300, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 16.01.2019 18:30, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 07:49:36AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Dec 11, 201
New feature bit for in-order feature of the upcoming
virtio 1.1. It's already supported by DPDK vhost-user
and virtio implementations. These changes required to
allow feature negotiation.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets
---
I just wanted to test this new feature in DPDK but failed
to
On 10.08.2018 01:51, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 07:54:37PM +0300, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>> New feature bit for in-order feature of the upcoming
>> virtio 1.1. It's already supported by DPDK vhost-user
>> and virtio implementations. These changes re
On 10.08.2018 11:28, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 10.08.2018 01:51, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 07:54:37PM +0300, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>> New feature bit for in-order feature of the upcoming
>>> virtio 1.1. It's already supported b
On 10.08.2018 12:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 11:28:47AM +0300, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>> On 10.08.2018 01:51, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 07:54:37PM +0300, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>>> New feature bit for in-order featu
On 10.08.2018 22:19, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 02:04:47PM +0300, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>> On 10.08.2018 12:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 11:28:47AM +0300, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>>> On 10.08.2018 01:51, Michael S. Ts
On 13.08.2018 12:56, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 10:55:23AM +0300, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>> On 10.08.2018 22:19, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 02:04:47PM +0300, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>>> On 10.08.2018 12:34, Michael S. Ts
On 13.08.2018 18:35, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 06:28:06PM +0300, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>> On 13.08.2018 12:56, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 10:55:23AM +0300, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>>> On 10.08.2018 22:19, Michael S. Ts
On 13.12.2017 23:03, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Backends don't need to know what frontend requested a reset,
> and notifying then from virtio_error is messy because
> virtio_error itself might be invoked from backend.
>
> Let's just set the status directly.
>
e), but is being release now since it was
> delayed from its intended release date.
>
> Thanks!
>
[...]
>
> Ilya Maximets (1):
> migration: Stop postcopy fault thread before notifying
Hi.
Sorry for late response, but what about following two patches:
c4f753859ae6
101 - 114 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
