Hi All, I am new to the list. I understand it may be possible for QEUM
to take a VMware image and
convert the VMware file format so that it can run on a XEN/VPS (domu).
I would appreciate if anyone can confirm this for me. Also, any further
comments/suggestions
to the above would be helpful!
Thanks Jim, that's great to hear!
Jim C. Brown wrote:
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 03:08:04PM -0400, Joe Lee wrote:
Hi All, I am new to the list. I understand it may be possible for QEUM
to take a VMware image and
convert the VMware file format so that it can run on a XEN/VPS (domu).
I would
Wanted to know about individuals that provides support and custom
development for QEUM.
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
12/06/2006, a las 20:32, Joe Lee escribió:
Wanted to know about individuals that provides support and custom
development for QEUM.
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
I am looking for a good GUI for QEMU. Below are the one I've found about
so far. Does anyone know of any other good GUI
that would be similar to VMware?
http://sourceforge.net/projects/kqemu/
http://emeitner.f2o.org/qemu_launcher
Mike Kronenberg wrote:
On 13.06.2006, at 16:37, Joe Lee wrote
I was wondering if there's the capability to have a vmware player type
functionality to qemu. This is just to allow playing or running images
with out needing to create virtual machines. May this could be a
separate product. What's everyones thought to this?
Joe
your comments/feedback!
joe
Paul Brook wrote:
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 15:55, Joe Lee wrote:
I was wondering if there's the capability to have a vmware player type
functionality to qemu. This is just to allow playing or running images
with out needing to create virtual machines. May
that could quickly run the image (appliance).
Joe
Paul Brook wrote:
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 16:53, Joe Lee wrote:
Why on earth would we want to make a crippled version of qemu?
AFAIK Creating a VMware virtual machine is just making a config file.
qemu doesn't have config files, so your
Thanks for the comments below, It seems that QEMU can easily be used to
run images. I will start to look into the availabe GUI front-ends for QEMU.
- joe
Jan Marten Simons wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 14. Juni 2006 18:21 schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
An VMWare player appliance is really just a disk
Some of us appriciate the fact that qemu has no GUI per se. ;0)
Your right! the keyword is some but not all. I think if QEMU is to be
adopted by the masses it will need to come up with a quality
GUI-Frontend. However the CLI can always be in place for those who want
and prefer to use it.
Good point on that, BUT it's not just about the GUI. It's about an
easy way to install the product and run a given app without the need
to create/setup a VM - To me that is the benefit of the VMware player.
However, not much of a big benefit IF QEMU is made easy to install and
has a nice GUI
WaxDragon wrote:
On 6/15/06, Joe Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good point on that, BUT it's not just about the GUI. It's about an
easy way to install the product and run a given app without the need
to create/setup a VM - To me that is the benefit of the VMware player.
However, not much of a big
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Joe Lee wrote:
Some of us appriciate the fact that qemu has no GUI per se. ;0)
Your right! the keyword is some but not all. I think if QEMU is to be
adopted by the masses it will need to come up with a quality GUI-Frontend
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Joe Lee wrote:
BTW, I am curious to know how much would it cost to develop a good
GUI-Frontend for QEMU that would be comparable to VMware. How much man
hours would this likely take?
I do not know VMware. Anybody? I would
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Joe Lee wrote:
You're right! However, as Julian pointed out: it is less than fascinating to
work on a GUI, _especially_ if it is for the masses who tend to criticize
without contributing*Footnote 1*.
I am not sure I agree
to go in the GUI.
Beyond that, what does more bling really bring to the table?
On Thursday 15 June 2006 16:03, Joe Lee wrote:
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Joe Lee wrote:
BTW, I am curious to know how much would it cost to develop a good
GUI-Frontend
wayne tempel wrote:
Hey Everybody,
What's up? Wayne here, anyway I found something
interesting that I thought that I would share, it's freeware, it's
called VMX Wizard, for making virtual machines. You can download it at :
rhysgoodwin.orcon.net.nz/vmxwizard/
wayne tempel wrote:
Hey Everybody,
What's up? Wayne here, anyway I found something
interesting that I thought that I would share, it's freeware, it's
called VMX Wizard, for making virtual machines. You can download it at :
rhysgoodwin.orcon.net.nz/vmxwizard/
To me no matter how you pronounce it, It's not a pronounce friendly type
name - IMO.
Joe
Ed Swierk wrote:
On 6/28/06, Paul Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How should you pronounce Qemu?
FYI, my best guess is Q (as in the letter Q) followed by the first 2
syllables of emulator.
That's how
I would be interested in a GUI that is not specific to QEMU. e.g. Xen/VT,
Basilisk II, SheepShaver, etc. ;-)
Gwenole, can you elaborate more on your comments above. Are your
comments referring to having a GUI that can both run and manage several
virtualization product (QEMU, XEN, etc) from
cross-platform is it?
-joe
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 07:03:31PM -0400, Joe Lee wrote:
I would be interested in a GUI that is not specific to QEMU. e.g. Xen/VT,
Basilisk II, SheepShaver, etc. ;-)
Gwenole, can you elaborate more on your comments above. Are your
Jim C. Brown wrote:
For the record, we can use wxWidgets in qemu even though we can not use C++
in qemu (something that I would be strongly against).
http://wxc.sourceforge.net/
Requiring this as a dependency would make it easier to deal with issues such as
C++ ABI compatibility by avoiding
Hi All,
I was wondering why the main QEMU site does not have link to download
windows version for QEMU directly from the QEMU.org site. This link only
exist here: http://www.h7.dion.ne.jp/~qemu-win/
Isn't the windows version developed by the same developers? Also, about
the MAC-OS version,
Anthony Liguori wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 14:37:10 -0400, Evan Paul wrote:
The libVirt project is a community-sponsored project that aims to bring
more simplicity and standards to the Linux VM world. At its core,
libVirt is a C toolkit that provides interaction with virtualization
24 matches
Mail list logo
