On 2021-06-16 11:01 am, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15 2021, "jonathan.albrecht"
wrote:
On 2021-06-14 11:07 pm, Richard Henderson wrote:
The PSW_MASK_CC component of psw.mask was not handled properly
in the creation or restoration of signal frames.
Thanks Richard! Peter an
On 2021-06-21 9:44 am, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
On Mon, 2021-06-21 at 09:12 -0400, jonathan.albrecht wrote:
On 2021-06-21 8:00 am, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-06-10 at 11:49 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > On 02.06.21 02:22, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> > > qemu-
On 2021-06-21 8:00 am, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
On Thu, 2021-06-10 at 11:49 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 02.06.21 02:22, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> qemu-s390x puts a wrong value into SIGILL's siginfo_t's psw.addr:
> it
> should be a pointer to the instruction following the illegal
>
On 2021-06-14 11:07 pm, Richard Henderson wrote:
The PSW_MASK_CC component of psw.mask was not handled properly
in the creation or restoration of signal frames.
Thanks Richard! Peter and I tested this series against:
* https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1886793
*
On 2021-06-01 8:22 pm, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
Verify that s390x-specific uc_mcontext.psw.addr is reported correctly.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich
---
tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target | 1 +
tests/tcg/s390x/signal.c| 163
2 files changed, 164
On 2021-07-02 8:01 am, Laurent Vivier wrote:
Le 02/07/2021 à 12:34, Cornelia Huck a écrit :
On Wed, Jun 23 2021, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
What's the status of this and
<20210621141452.2045-1-jonathan.albre...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>?
linux-user
is not really my turf, but it would be sad if this
On 2021-07-12 4:02 pm, Laurent Vivier wrote:
Le 09/07/2021 à 18:04, Jonathan Albrecht a écrit :
qemu-s390x signals with SIGILL on compare-and-trap instructions. This
breaks OpenJDK which expects SIGFPE in its implementation of implicit
exceptions.
This patch depends on [PATCH v6 0/2]
On 2021-07-05 5:29 am, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21 2021, Jonathan Albrecht
wrote:
qemu-s390x signals with SIGILL on compare-and-trap instructions. This
breaks OpenJDK which expects SIGFPE in its implementation of implicit
exceptions.
This patch depends on [PATCH v3 0/2] target/s390x:
On 2021-07-08 1:08 pm, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 7/7/21 6:42 AM, Jonathan Albrecht wrote:
+sig = TARGET_SIGFPE;
+if ((n & 0x03) == 0) {
+/* An IEEE exception, simulated or otherwise. */
if (n & 0x80) {
On 2021-07-09 10:37 am, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 7/9/21 7:23 AM, jonathan.albrecht wrote:
As a general comment, I think a single switch over DXC would be
cleaner for both kernel and qemu. It seems like giving different
si_code for e.g. "0x40 IEEE division by zero" and "0x43
Ping. Could this patch be reviewed? The other code fix patch in this
series has been reviewed so if these tests can be reviewed then both
this series:
https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20210705210434.45824-1-...@linux.ibm.com/
and the dependent series:
11 matches
Mail list logo
