On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote:
Hi,
Am 02.04.2014 09:32, schrieb Sai Prajeeth:
I am booting an OpenIndiana image on qemu by using the -smp 4 option. I
seem to be running into this known
bug
Solaris can be a bit tricky since it supports 32 and 64-bit
applications. Oracle Solaris 11 disabled 32-bit boot but
still supports 32-bit applications.
Are the rest of the libraries in the generated Makefile 32-bit or
64-bit? On Solaris, it's fairly easy to tell since the 64-bit libraries
are
I picked up a omap2430 prototype board, and am looking to start
working with this. Since this is a foray back into development for
me, I'm a little overwhelmed by the amount of information I'm trying
to digest in starting this project (and the user forum at qemu-forum.ipi.fi
being down is a bit
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 1:56 PM, jonatan perry jonata...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Mulyadi!
Regarding my first qeustion: no, I don't want remote access to the machine,
I want local access, something like starting a linux os, and launch from
shell qemu so he will run a graphic operation system, like
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Loïc Minier l...@dooz.org wrote:
Check whether sdl-config is available before calling it, otherwise
./configure triggers a warning:
./configure: 957: sdl-config: not found
If neither the .pc file not sdl-config are present, disable SDL support.
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Paul Brook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 (Gentoo 4.1.2 p1.0.2)
Which part of gcc 4.x is not supported didn't you understand?
Paul
Apparently, we should make configure fail horribly if gcc4 is found even
if disable-gcc-check is enabled.
for the code I have is at
http://svn9.cvsdude.com/kdesolaris/kqemu/trunk/1.0.3pre11
If anyone wants to test it out the code in there, and there's a
patch I'm missing, let me know.
Thanks,
Ben Taylor
Daniel P. Berrange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 03:53:46PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Content-Description: message body text
bdrv_flush is declared to return void, but this is wrong because it
means that the implementations have nowhere to report their errors.
Andrew Warkentin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sergey Bychkov wrote:
- Original Message - From: Ralf Baerwaldt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Sent: 19.02.2008 18:09
Subject: [Qemu-devel] precompiled qemu-system-x86_64 is 32 bit instead
of 64bit
I
Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Andreas Färber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Making qemu use 10.0.3.x not 10.0.2.x
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 13:58:28 +0100
Am 05.02.2008 um 12:30 schrieb Ian Jackson:
I don't believe that 10.0.2.0/24 was chosen randomly
Asheesh Laroia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Ben Taylor wrote:
It seems to me that there is a corner case where the local host has a
10.0.2.x or 10.0.x.x address which would cause a qemu guest problems
that has a 10.0.2.15 address (for -net user only).
That's
Solaris has boolean_t defined, so this #ifndef allows hw/e1000.c
to compile on Solaris.
Ben
--- qemu.ORIG/hw/e1000.c2008-02-02 21:20:18.0 -0500
+++ qemu/hw/e1000.c 2008-02-04 10:39:33.097052000 -0500
@@ -28,7 +28,9 @@
#include net.h
#define __iomem
+#ifndef __sun__
Juergen Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Färber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following part of configure is triggered on a fully-updated
Solaris 10 8/07 amd64:
#
# Solaris specific configure tool chain decisions
#
if test $solaris = yes ; then
#
# gcc
Andreas Färber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The following part of configure is triggered on a fully-updated
Solaris 10 8/07 amd64:
#
# Solaris specific configure tool chain decisions
#
if test $solaris = yes ; then
#
# gcc for solaris 10/fcs in /usr/sfw/bin doesn't
Pablo Virolainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Nestor wrote:
It seems qemu-forum.ipi.fi is down. Is there an alternate place one
can obtain source snapshots or browse the user forums?
It should be back online once again (and it has been almost all the
time). The reason you
Robert Nestor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems qemu-forum.ipi.fi is down. Is there an alternate place one
can obtain source snapshots or browse the user forums?
I mentioned something to Pablo, and he said he could see it
from where he was, but he suspected there's some DNS problem
Vegard Nossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I experience the following problem: Setting the trap flag (TF) of the
EFLAGS register correctly calls the debug exception DE. However, the
DR6 register does not have the single step (BS) flag set.
I remember this getting submitted. which
After some testing, I've made a minor fix to the Rev 1.66 patch of hw/ide.c.
With this patch, and the current CVS tree, I'm once again able to see the
devices after clicking on MyComputer in my Win98SE guest.
Ben
--- qemu.ORIG/hw/ide.c 2007-11-08 11:38:17.0 -0500
+++ qemu/hw/ide.c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to get networking to work with ME/98 as guest ?
No network device shows up in this case as in XP which works fine.
Command I use;
qemu -hda Win98.img -net nic,model=rtl8139 -net user
maybe because you have to download
I have a couple of win98se guests that I keep around for testing and upgrade
tests and the like.
The current CVS code has no problem booting these images, but the first
time I do anything (like read the cdrom, or change directories in windows
explorer), the guest just hangs. This seems like a
Ben Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a couple of win98se guests that I keep around for testing and upgrade
tests and the like.
The current CVS code has no problem booting these images, but the first
time I do anything (like read the cdrom, or change directories in windows
I'm getting this error compiling hw/sh7750.c
I believe the problem comes from the include in hw/sh_intc.h
with the macro
#define _INTC_ARRAY(a) a, sizeof(a)/sizeof(*a)
in line 587 of hw/7750.c, I see
sh_intc_register_sources(s-intc,
Enclosed is an updated set of patches for configure, Makefile and
Makefile.target.
the configure and Makefile.target fixes are for compiling qemu on Solaris x86-64
the Makefile patch is for qemu-img when it compiles it on a system
that does not have gnutls in a standard place.
Questions?
Atoosaah S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do I enable debugging?
I checked the configure file and I do not see any options for compiling with
debugging, i.e. there is no --enable-debug option. I see that the default
parameters section of the configure file sets: gdbstub=yes but other
Included are two small patches for configure and Makefile.target to
allow QEMU to configure and build correctly on a Solaris x86-64 platform.
Ben--- qemu.ORIG/configure 2007-09-29 21:58:31.0 -0400
+++ qemu/configure 2007-10-04 12:52:30.776801000 -0400
@@ -575,7 +575,7 @@
#undef
J. Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 23:14 +0200, Luca wrote:
On 9/17/07, Andreas Färber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 17.09.2007 um 14:18 schrieb Christian MICHON:
On 9/17/07, Philip Boulain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DON'T DO THIS KIND OF COMMIT AGAIN,
Johannes Schindelin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ben,
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007, Ben Taylor wrote:
+#ifdef __sun__
+/* Have to define this for Solaris as ULONG_LONG_MAX is not defined
+ anywhere. ULONG_MAX is correct only on _LP64 systems */
+#define ULONG_LONG_MAX
By default, uname -i returns i86pc on i386 or x86_64 system. This patch makes
it possible to for Solaris systems to get the right hardware type.
--- qemu.ORIG/configure 2007-08-24 21:37:51.0 -0400
+++ qemu/configure 2007-09-15 08:53:34.288345000 -0400
@@ -155,6 +155,12 @@
just cleaning up some annoying at the end of some lines
--- qemu/configure.ORIG 2007-09-15 08:58:23.283818000 -0400
+++ qemu/configure 2007-09-15 08:58:34.878425000 -0400
@@ -409,7 +409,7 @@
oss=no
fi
-# Check for gcc4, error if pre-gcc4
+# Check for gcc4, error if pre-gcc4
if
Corrected version of the patch.
--- qemu.ORIG/configure 2007-08-24 21:37:51.0 -0400
+++ qemu/configure 2007-09-15 09:07:47.928893000 -0400
@@ -155,6 +155,12 @@
install=ginstall
needs_libsunmath=no
solarisrev=`uname -r | cut -f2 -d.`
+# have to select again,
Compiling the latest CVS code, I found that a function in vl.c uses a define
called ULONG_LONG_MAX. The value is defined in solaris's sys/types.h,
but only on _LP64 builds, so 32-bit builds won't pickup if I redefine it as
ULONG_MAX.
I'm looking for comments on this patch.
--- qemu.ORIG/vl.h
Jorge Lucángeli Obes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been giving some thought to Anthony's idea:
http://kvm.qumranet.com/kvmwiki/Specs/StoringCommandLineInImage
However, maybe I'm just too much on vacations, but I don't seem to
come up with a nice way of doing this. Everything keeps
Alexey Eremenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some news about Solaris on Qemu:
My Solaris is v2005, x86-64 + x86 on the same DVD. I installed the
x86-64 version.
Ugh. don't bother with that version. Download S10 U3 (11/06) or S10 U4
(07/07) [if it's been released yet]
Host: Fedora 7,
Alexey Eremenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Host: Fedora 7, 64-bit, Qemu 0.9, AMD Opteron.
If you are using Qemu 0.9, not CVS, there are several bugs
that have been fixed in the CVS code which fixed Solaris installs
in QEMU.
Guest: Solaris 10 (32-bit, 2005 release) aborts install in the
There are two patches included in the mail
1) qemu-sdl-error.diff - patch to capture output from the sdl compile test, and
output it if there
is an error at reporting time (and delete the file when finished)
2) qemu-sdl-whitespace.diff - patch to fix the indentation for the sdl-config
This is short configure patch which saves the output of the libsdl test comile
output
for a file which can be reviewed after configure runs. This allows for easier
debugging
of why the libSDL test failed.
Ben--- qemu/configure.ORIG 2007-06-14 13:58:26.144281000 -0400
+++ qemu/configure
Blue Swirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:44:39PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
Hi,
I found a bug in the subpage checking code. Could you try if the
attached patch fixes the problem?
thats a negative.
Hi Julia,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:10:02AM -0400, Ben Taylor wrote:
I've been keeping up with CVS patches for qemu about once a week. I just
updated
tonight after the big round of patches that have been commited and am
seeing a
consistent failure
I've been keeping up with CVS patches for qemu about once a week. I just
updated
tonight after the big round of patches that have been commited and am seeing a
consistent failure with my existing ubuntu-7.04 32-bit guest on Solaris 10/x86
32-bit
host. The last time I tested the CVS code would
This set of patches allows 64-bit Solaris 10/11 X86 to compile qemu in a 64bit
environment. It requires a 64-bit libsdl, but has been tested with all the
tests
(sparc, arm, mips, mipsel, linux-i386, and DamnSmallLinux)
Ben
--- qemu.ORIG/Makefile.target 2007-05-16 07:59:39.0 -0400
+++
I've recrafted my patch for supporting OpenSound System on Solaris by
checking for it automatically, instead of providing an option. Also added
a status flag on whether OSS is enabled or not.
Ben--- qemu.ORIG/configure 2007-05-09 10:06:06.0 -0400
+++ qemu/configure 2007-05-12
Jeff Chua [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For those who does minimal install. In this case, texi2html would not
be available on the system. I've seen quite a few systems without
texi2html.
Again, the patch is not a MUST, but it's nice not to see unnecessary warning.
I suppose you could do
a patch like this was posted about 6 weeks ago. the
only difference I can see between this and the
previous patch is the location of the inserted
function.
take a look at
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2007-03/msg00123.html
for hints. This patch fixed the Solaris/express
Francois Visconte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm currently developing an OS deployment tool similar to G4U (ghost for
unix).
This is a very basic tool
- boot an initrd
- configure network
- ssh deployment-server cat image.dd /dev/sda
- reboot
I'm using qemu to
This patch is a consolodation of patches and ideas from BlueSwirl, Martin
Bochnig and myself.
The patch is comprized of three parts:
1) to more accurately set the compile flags on sparc hosts, with an eye
for sparc_v8plus and sparc_v8plusa, as well as sparc_v9, and leaving
the option for
An Update to the previous patch. Some of the variables and
defines in Makefile.target were not removed as part of the
new sparc host configuration.
Ben
Ben Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch is a consolodation of patches and ideas from BlueSwirl, Martin
Bochnig and myself
This fixes a linker error for target-i386/helper.c on Solaris 9/Sparc,
as Solaris 9/Sparc does not include the isinf function or macro.
Due to the use of libsunmath on Solaris 9/X86, this feature is
not needed.
Ben
--- qemu.ORIG/target-i386/helper.c 2007-04-03 12:38:34.0 -0400
+++
andrzej zaborowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
with QEMU_AUDIO_DRV set to sdl and booting from CD-ROM with AIO on
a Linux host and with SDL 1.2.11, qemu locks up in sigwait() (the main
thread) and SDL_SemWait() (the audio thread) as soon as music is
playing and CD-ROM is being read
This patch further isolates the functions needed for kqemu.c by Solaris.
The original include has the unintended side effect of screwing up
the mips targets on Solaris 9/x86 because there are some defines
that get included via sys/modctl.h that change how the CPU
structure in the
Stefan Weil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
File eepro100.tar.bz2 (added to this mail) contains everything
needed to add 3 new PCI network device (all similar to EEPRO100):
eepro100.patch:
Makefile.target:
added two binaries needed for EEPRO100
split entries for
Anthony Liguori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kyle Hubert wrote:
Hi, I'm working with QEMU on an XFree86 machine. I was desirous of
having 1600x1200 working in the virtual machine, so I looked at using
the -std-vga option with the vesa X driver.
You probably have to increase your hsync
Avi Kivity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wang Cheng Yeh wrote:
thanks
If you include a description of what the patch does and why it is
necessary, it will probably be reviewed a lot quicker.
He's posted this one before, and the patch fixes such blatent
programming errors like an XOR
This patch is to fix (correctly) running mips, sparc and arm targets
on a Solaris/Sparc host.
This patch reverts the patch posted February 2nd, 2007, (found at
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2007-02/msg8.html
for reference). Juergen Keil found that config.h was not included
Thiemo Seufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ben Taylor wrote:
This patch is to fix (correctly) running mips, sparc and arm targets
on a Solaris/Sparc host.
This patch reverts the patch posted February 2nd, 2007, (found at
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2007-02
This patch cleans up Makefile target for sparc32 and sparc64
Solaris and non-Solaris targets share a large amount of the
definitions, so I split out the common parts and isolate just
the Solaris/non-Solaris portions and added readability.
Also fixed the x86_64 targets for Solaris to not use the
This patch was suggested by Juergen Keil.
It prevents a crash by qemu when running the arm-test on Solaris/Sparc.
Removing the previous arm patch for sparc uncovered a use
of global registers o0-05 which hadn't been defined previously.
Ben--- qemu-ORIG/cpu-exec.c 2007-03-16 19:58:11.0
Thiemo Seufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CVSROOT: /sources/qemu
Module name: qemu
Changes by: Thiemo Seufer ths 07/03/17 15:00:38
Modified files:
. : Makefile Makefile.target configure
Log message:
Better way to select -lrt, by Andrzei
J M Cerqueira Esteves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
herbie hancock wrote:
Hello, i had also a reproducible disk crash:
info of the last good image, size is about 3,5GB
I never experienced such a bad problem with qemu before, maybe it is a
problem with qcow2 format ?
After the
This patch fixes crashes when testing with arm-test-0.2.tar.gz and
mips-test-0.2.tar.gz.
Without the patch, both arm-test and mips-test segfault when trying to boot.
The original patch was authored by Martin Bochnig.
--- qemu/cpu-exec.c.ORIG 2007-03-13 09:46:51.940624000 -0400
+++
Paul Brook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 13 March 2007 14:01, Ben Taylor wrote:
This patch fixes crashes when testing with arm-test-0.2.tar.gz and
mips-test-0.2.tar.gz. Without the patch, both arm-test and mips-test
segfault when trying to boot.
I don't believe
This patch is to fix a big-endian problem in the RTL-8139 driver. The additional
debugging is mine, and the actual code fixes are by Garrison (Igor Kovalenko -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]). Code has been tested on 32-bit Solaris x86 and 32-bit
Solaris Sparc hosts, with and without debugging.
There were
Apologies to the list. I forgot to separate out the patches in a more
appropriate manner.
Patch 1: qemu-rtl8139-bigend.diff
This fixes the big-endian problem with the hw/rtl8139.c on a Sparc host.
Patch 2: qemu-rtl8139-impv-debug.difff
This is an improved macro for debugging. This patch
This fix was suggested by Juergen Kiel, and appears to work on my
Solaris 9/Sparc V490.
--- fpu/softfloat-native.c.ORIG 2007-03-07 07:30:28.662257000 -0500
+++ fpu/softfloat-native.c 2007-03-07 07:30:44.595051000 -0500
@@ -221,6 +221,12 @@
jeremy fenelon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey guys thanks for a great product. I don't know if its been documented
already but I was able to install windows xp on qemu with a HP Laptop
Restore disk.
Lucky. I think the last time I tried that, it didn't work because of the
way that HP
Was doing some testing on a sparc host, and found an interesting situation.
Code is 0.9.0-CVS, and I start qemu on my Ultra 60 (guest is windows 98se).
When I hit ctrl-alt-2, I don't get the monitor. I've added some debugging to
sdl.c, to try and figure out what is going on.
Hitting
Hi Malc,
malc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007, Ben Taylor wrote:
As I seem to have hit a wall with the ES1370 driver in qemu not working
on Solaris, I have modified configure to allow Solaris to use
OpenSoundSystems
audio.
Is there any interest in having
malc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Ben Taylor wrote:
[..snip..]
From where i stand SDL as the default is a bad idea.
Solaris without OSS audio doesn't have any other options.
There is no ALSA, and AFAIK, there isn't an fmod either.
However, I still think
As I seem to have hit a wall with the ES1370 driver in qemu not working
on Solaris, I have modified configure to allow Solaris to use OpenSoundSystems
audio.
Is there any interest in having a default audio setting for SDL so that
you won't have to always put QEMU_SDL_AUDIO=oss before you start
Robin Atwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This has been driving me mad! I have just installed Solaris 10 under Qemu and
specified the Xorg server to be used. I created xorg.conf with xorgconfig and
X started fine at 1024x768 using the Cirrus driver. When I edited xorg.conf
to specify a
Robin Atwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 21 Feb 2007, Julian Seward wrote:
(replying off list)
So you have Solaris 10 (x86 ?) running on qemu-0.9 ? Is it stable?
Does it work? I have it running on vmware-5.5.3 but would prefer to
move to running it on qemu if
I was wondering about the possibility of expanding the amount of vram
for the Cirrus Logic GDM5446 emulation. 8MB of ram would give the
ability to do 1600x1200 24 bit color. I know, this would probably completely
break windows and other drivers, but am wondeirng if the Cirrus Xorg
driver could
This patch against current CVS is an update of the previously posted Solaris
TAP patch. This small change fixes a large performance problem with
inbound packets (scp, ftp). The author found that some packets were
concatenated, which was the reason for the poor performance. This patch
fixes
Neo Jia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
I am wondering if I can do this - running FC4 inside Qemu on Sparc. From
opensolaris website, it seems that qemu 0.8.2 can be built but not sure if
it can work correctly.
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/qemu/
The current 0.9.0 CVS code
Kevin F. Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 22:48:51 +
Paul Brook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've very little sympathy (read: none) for people who accidentally
break things by running them as root.
On a related note, I've been running qemu(-system 0.8.2) as root
got patches?
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
This patch allows for the opensolaris kqemu module to be activated under
a Solaris Express (11) host running qemu.
The solaris kqemu module is located at:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/qemu/downloads/kqemu-osol-1.3.0pre9-v0.2.tar.gz
diff -ruN qemu-base/configure qemu/configure
---
Anyone think that the monitor help screen ought to implement some kind of paging
(think more) or something? I did a help, and half of the help is off the
screen before
I can figure out what I'm looking for (and apparently what I'm looking for is
already
scrolled off).
THoughts?
Ben
This is a patch to make block-raw.c compile correctly on Solaris.
I successfully created a raw image file after the patch was applied.
Ben
diff -ruN qemu-122806/block-raw.c qemu/block-raw.c
--- qemu-122806/block-raw.c 2006-12-22 09:19:53.0 -0500
+++ qemu/block-raw.c 2006-12-28
Fabrice,
Quick question about this patch (August 19, 2006)
The ENOMEDIUM variable is dummy'd up for Windows in vl.h.
I found that Solaris doesn't have an ENOMEDIUM variable, and I've
been able to get block.c to compile correctly by adding this to vl.h.
Before I go submitting anything, I just
Lennert Buytenhek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 08:40:27PM -0500, Ben Taylor wrote:
-snprintf(smb_cmdline, sizeof(smb_cmdline), /usr/sbin/smbd -s %s,
- smb_conf);
+snprintf(smb_cmdline, sizeof(smb_cmdline), % -s %s,
+ SMBD_BINARY
Seeing as there is some working going on in the Solaris QEMU port again,
here's a real short patch to support Samba working on a Solaris Host.
--- qemu-ORIG/vl.c 2006-12-22 12:29:05.0 -0500
+++ qemu/vl.c 2006-12-22 14:22:17.338815000 -0500
@@ -3069,8 +3069,13 @@
Paul Brook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 22 December 2006 21:29, Paul Brook wrote:
On Friday 22 December 2006 20:07, Ben Taylor wrote:
Seeing as there is some working going on in the Solaris QEMU port again,
here's a real short patch to support Samba working on a Solaris Host
Paul Brook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 22 December 2006 21:29, Paul Brook wrote:
On Friday 22 December 2006 20:07, Ben Taylor wrote:
Seeing as there is some working going on in the Solaris QEMU port again,
here's a real short patch to support Samba working on a Solaris Host
Paul Brook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 22 December 2006 21:29, Paul Brook wrote:
On Friday 22 December 2006 20:07, Ben Taylor wrote:
Seeing as there is some working going on in the Solaris QEMU port again,
here's a real short patch to support Samba working on a Solaris Host
Ishwar Rattan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trying to compile qemu on amd64 based Solaris.
I do not have write permission to /usr/local subtree
./configure --libdir=other-path --prefix=not-ustlocal
is fine
but make always generates binaries that want to find
Ishwar Rattan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trying to compile qemu on amd64 based Solaris.
I do not have write permission to /usr/local subtree
./configure --libdir=other-path --prefix=not-ustlocal
is fine
but make always generates binaries that want to find
Martin Bochnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ben Taylor wrote:
As Martin indicated, setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH may get you a running
binary, but LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the wrong answer for Solaris.
My answer had been a bit longer:
Read ld.so.1(1)
i.e.
# man ld.so.1
Then: *One
Martin Bochnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ben Taylor wrote:
Ishwar Rattan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trying to compile qemu on amd64 based Solaris.
I do not have write permission to /usr/local subtree
./configure --libdir=other-path --prefix=not-ustlocal
is fine
Ishwar Rattan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Martin Bochnig wrote:
Ishwar Rattan wrote:
Where is the problem 64bit versus 32bit ?
(32 bit version of libSDL-1.2.so.0 found while amd64 64bit version needed?)
(should go under
Blue Swirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, we could easily design and implement an ideal CPU just for Qemu
purposes.
This s reminds me of Java.
Except that Java VM is not suitable target for all classes of programming
languages, like C.
I wondered if you could use the
Alessandro Corradi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
This is my question:
If I run qemu for i386 without kqemu it uses soft-mmu, so it operates as
another architetture as ppc or mips right?
So... are the performace of qemu the same if I use i386 or mips or something
change deeply?
Blue Swirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last time I missed a lot of the functions, this version should be complete.
I see no difference in operation with or without the patch. Comments?
Other than it didn't apply against the current CVS? Was there a requirement
for a previous patch you
Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 16 May 2006, Ben Taylor wrote:
(ITU), such as the DiskUpdate on tools.de/solaris/itu/DU.zip which
has a modifed RTL8029 driver that works with Qemu on SolarisX86.
Obviosly, if you boot a Solaris 10/x86 install with -B
acpi-user
Christian MICHON [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no
the error message from vista is explicit: no acpi, no boot.
On 6/9/06, Sylvain Petreolle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Nigel J. Terry [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Yes you do need ACPI to get the .iso to boot. I tried it and it
Fabrice or Paul:
Can we get this added? This patch has been posted to the list 4 or 5 times
in various incarnations in the last year or soj. I posted a long message with
the logs from the compile on why the current code is wrong, and why this patch
fixes
it. The basic problem is that code
Julian Seward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using the latest cvs sources on x86 SuSE 10.0 host, Win2K guest,
the 1152x864 mode offered to me by Windows doesn't work. Instead
I just get moved to 640x480, it looks like. The modes on either
side of it - 1024x768 and 1280x1024 work fine. Is
Paul Brook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 25 May 2006 14:16, Ben Taylor wrote:
The question came up a little while back about getting Solaris (Sparc) to
boot in qemu under qemu-system-sparc.
I did a little work yesterday to find out that the boot process in
hw/sun4m.c
Ishwar Rattan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any one has had success with this combination?
Haven't tried it yet.
Also, anyone running any x86 version of Solaris
under qemu? I would like a copy of the disk-image
if possible.
Depending on the version of Solaris x86 you want to run,
the
Kazu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tuesday, May 16, 2006 3:55 PM Christian MICHON wrote:
how can we do the same if the host is winXP ?
Today, on linux guests, 2.4.x kernel boot faster than 2.6.x kernel
inside qemu (unless using clock=pit on 2.6.x). 2 days ago,
when I tried to setup
Ben Pfaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ben Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Enclosed is the latest version of the qemu solaris/sparc patch, applied
against yesterday's CVS (post BGR update).
I'm happy to say that this patch makes qemu compile and work on
Solaris quite nicely for me
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo