[Bug 1885553] [NEW] make-check test failed with "Segmentation fault"

Public bug reported: While running the make-check testing on arm architecture the test failed with error: "kill_qemu() detected QEMU death from signal 11 (Segmentation fault) (core dumped)". Apart from that make-install test always passes. The problem doesn't reproduce in 100% qemu - from the

Re: [PATCH-for-5.0 v3] Acceptance test: Fix to EXEC migration

Hi Philippe Thanks for the review I have some comments On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 2:30 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > Hi Oksana, > > v2 was > https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg682899.html, so > this is v3. Please increment the version in the patch subject. > > You could

Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] Acceptance test: provides new functions

Hi Willian I totally agree with your comments I'll move those functions outside the class Let me update and repost the patch Thanks On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 6:22 PM Willian Rampazzo wrote: > Hi Oksana, > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 12:15 PM Oksana Vohchana > wrote: > > > > Provides new functions

Re: [PATCH v2] python/qemu/qmp.py: QMP debug with VM label

Hi Eduardo I'm already fixing it. Thank you, On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 5:39 PM Eduardo Habkost wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 04:05:47PM +0200, Oksana Vohchana wrote: > > QEMUMachine writes some messages to the default logger. > > But it sometimes hard to read the output if we have requests to

Re: [PATCH] python/qemu/qmp.py: QMP debug with VM label

Hi John Your approach to using logger hierarchy it's actually what I need. Thanks for the review. The second version of the patch I will send in a few mins On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 3:46 AM John Snow wrote: > > > On 3/4/20 5:05 AM, Oksana Vohchana wrote: > > QEMUMachine writes some messages to

Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] Acceptance test: provides new functions

Hi Wainer, Thanks for review On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 8:31 PM Wainer dos Santos Moschetta < waine...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Oksana, > > On 2/14/20 12:52 PM, Oksana Vohchana wrote: > > Adds functions to check if service RDMA is enabled and gets the interface > > where it was configured > > > >

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] Acceptance test: provides to use different transport for migration

Hi Philippe You can do whatever it takes I appreciate you for a review Thanks On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 4:12 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 2/3/20 12:16 PM, Oksana Vohchana wrote: > > Along with VM migration via TCP, we can use migration through EXEC > > and UNIX transport protocol > > > >