[Bug 1859656] Re: [2.6] Unable to reboot s390x KVM machine after initial deploy

2020-04-09 Thread Sean Feole
It would appear that this bug is once again causing problems with some of our automated testing. S390x KVM deployments are failing for Focal. When attempting to investigate a big I found that it is indeed this bug. Our MAAS Server is Version: maas: Installed:

[Bug 1859656] Re: [2.6] Unable to reboot s390x KVM machine after initial deploy

2020-04-09 Thread Sean Feole
Also, please note that the libvirt version did not change on the s390x Virtual Machine Host. On S390x VM Host ii libvirt-clients 4.0.0-1ubuntu8.14 s390xPrograms for the libvirt library ii libvirt-daemon4.0.0-1ubuntu8.14

[Bug 1859656] Re: [2.6] Unable to reboot s390x KVM machine after initial deploy

2020-02-10 Thread Sean Feole
After looking at the original description it does appear that I upgraded maas since originally filing this bug, that upgrade was done to workaround a different issue which was resolved since 2.6.1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu- devel-ml, which is

[Bug 1859656] Re: [2.6] Unable to reboot s390x KVM machine after initial deploy

2020-02-10 Thread Sean Feole
Here is my pkg versions as things are now. maas: Installed: 2.6.2-7841-ga10625be3-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 Candidate: 2.6.2-7841-ga10625be3-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 On the s390x Lpar, Bionic, Linux s2lp6 4.15.0-74-generic #84-Ubuntu SMP Thu Dec 19 08:05:42 UTC 2019 s390x s390x s390x GNU/Linux

[Bug 1859656] Re: [2.6] Unable to reboot s390x KVM machine after initial deploy

2020-02-10 Thread Sean Feole
To add to this discussion today, I noticed that some of the maas deployments for s390x are working. I took a look and I was able to successfully deploy 19.10/18.04/20.04 I have not changed anything on the MAAS host, I have not upgraded / altered any packages. I have not upgraded libvirt, The

[Bug 1859656] Re: [2.6] Unable to reboot s390x KVM machine after initial deploy

2020-02-10 Thread Sean Feole
@paelzer, Aye and thanks for your comment #27 , I was already aware of that, and yes that does work. However, it's a shoddy workaround at best and if this is going to be a solution to be presented to a customer MAAS would be scoffed at. I'm aware of the issue at hand here, I think the problem

[Bug 1859656] Re: [2.6] Unable to reboot s390x KVM machine after initial deploy

2020-01-21 Thread Sean Feole
Please note# https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1790901 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu- devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1859656 Title: [2.6] Unable to reboot s390x KVM machine after initial deploy

[Bug 1859656] Re: [2.6] Unable to reboot s390x KVM machine after initial deploy

2020-01-21 Thread Sean Feole
I tried the above workaround mentioned by Christian last week also, I did not mention that in comment #6. I tried using the boot order configuration as outlined in the example(comment #9) After the machine deploys, the same symptom occurs. So we are sort of stuck again still. Domain s2lp6g001

[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1719196] Re: [arm64 ocata] newly created instances are unable to raise network interfaces

2017-10-19 Thread Sean Feole
I've testing with the same packages listed in comment #28, Confirmed that this now works.. See attached log ** Attachment added: "novaout.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/libvirt/+bug/1719196/+attachment/4977254/+files/novaout.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1719196] Re: [arm64 ocata] newly created instances are unable to raise network interfaces

2017-10-19 Thread Sean Feole
will test these and report back shortly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu- devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1719196 Title: [arm64 ocata] newly created instances are unable to raise network interfaces Status in

[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1719196] Re: [arm64 ocata] newly created instances are unable to raise network interfaces

2017-10-18 Thread Sean Feole
To further reinforce what Christian said, the Newton cloud-archive also uses virtio-mmio for its address type. (See my comment#15) Newton XML: but we have proven this works with Newton. Is it fair to say this could be attributed to a change

[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1719196] Re: [arm64 ocata] newly created instances are unable to raise network interfaces

2017-10-11 Thread Sean Feole
I spent some time today trying to modify the ocata xml templates produced in /etc/libvirt/qemu/.xml for each of the generated instances. Destroying & Undefining the existing instance, making some changes and redefining the xml, however it appears that nova regenerates these templates upon

[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1719196] Re: [arm64 ocata] newly created instances are unable to raise network interfaces

2017-10-04 Thread Sean Feole
I was able to gather libvirt XMLs from both Newton and Ocata Instances, see attached sfeole@BSG-75:~$ diff xmlocata xmlnewton 1,2c1,2 < < main type='kvm' id='1'> --- > ubuntu@lundmark:/var/lib/nova/instances/358596e4-135d-461d-a514-84116440014c$ > sudo virsh dumpxml instance-0001 > 4c4 <

[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1719196] Re: [arm64 ocata] newly created instances are unable to raise network interfaces

2017-10-03 Thread Sean Feole
Taken from the upgraded hypervisor: ubuntu@awrep3:/var/lib/nova/instances/2cec409e-de92-4d29-ad68-3f1d1f8be7fc$ sudo qemu-system-aarch64 --version QEMU emulator version 2.8.0(Debian 1:2.8+dfsg-3ubuntu2.3~cloud0) Copyright (c) 2003-2016 Fabrice Bellard and the QEMU Project developers

[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1719196] Re: [arm64 ocata] newly created instances are unable to raise network interfaces

2017-10-03 Thread Sean Feole
Taken from the upgraded hypervisor ubuntu@aw3:/var/lib/nova/instances/2cec409e-de92-4d29-ad68-3f1d1f8be7fc$ sudo qemu-system-aarch64 --version QEMU emulator version 2.8.0(Debian 1:2.8+dfsg-3ubuntu2.3~cloud0) Copyright (c) 2003-2016 Fabrice Bellard and the QEMU Project developers

[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1719196] Re: [arm64 ocata] newly created instances are unable to raise network interfaces

2017-10-03 Thread Sean Feole
Today I ran some tests and installed a Newton Deployment on arm64, which we already know works. I upgraded QEMU and Libvirt on one of the hypervisors from the xenial-updates/ocata cloud-archive. See attached notes. Libvirt - 1.3.1-1ubuntu10.14 -> 2.5.0-3ubuntu5.5~cloud0 QEMU -