The RAM region was just too big. I made it smaller and the VM didn't
crash and moved past that point.
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 1:58 PM Dr. David Alan Gilbert
wrote:
>
> * Wayne Li (waynli...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > Dear QEMU list members,
> >
> > We developed a virtual m
ve. Does anyone know
much about these QEMU functions? What could be causing these RAM
initialzation functions to fail in this way?
-Thanks, Wayne Li
this to stop working when KVM is
enabled? Or maybe I’m not understanding something right and missing
what the problem actually is? Let me know your thoughts.
-Thanks, Wayne Li
ell
wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 at 05:41, Wayne Li wrote:
> > Also, I do have another side question. When running with KVM enabled, I
> >see the kernel-level ioctl call KVM_RUN running and then returning over
> >and over again (by the way before the VM kinda grinds to a halt I on
from incrementing.
-Thanks, Wayne Li
on it in case it's important.
Anyway, I'm really not sure what the problem is. This is everything I know
at the moment but I really don't a have a good idea on why the operating
system code isn't being run. Please let me know your thoughts.
-Thanks!, Wayne Li
specifically?
Maybe I'll have to go into the code to add print statements that print out
the TCG ops?
-Thanks!, Wayne Li
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 10:56 AM Peter Maydell
wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 at 16:39, Wayne Li wrote:
> > Anyway that's the background. The specific problem I'm hav
nk
it would be really helpful if I knew more about this assertion. What
exactly is trying to check for here and why? Do you see how it could
relate to endianism issues in any way?
-Thanks!, Wayne Li
Thanks David and Zalton for the awesome explanations. They're very helpful
to us!
-Thanks, Wayne Li
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 9:49 PM David Gibson
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 10:40:44AM -0600, Wayne Li wrote:
> > Dear David Gibson,
> >
> > I know you are under no
this isn't possible
would be absolutely critical.
-Thanks, Wayne Li
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 1:17 AM Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 12/12/19 02:59, Wayne Li wrote:
> > We wrote a project that is created on top of the QEMU source code; it
> > calls functions from the QEMU code. I run
like the PowerPC 7457 is Book3S and the PowerPC e6500 is BookE.
Is that why you think I require a Book3S KVM? Exactly why do you feel this
way? Also would that mean my team would need to go and buy a board with a
Book3S processor?
-Thanks!, Wayne Li
>From my understanding
On Wed, Dec 11, 2
here? I'm just pretty lost right now haha.
-Thanks, Wayne Li
:
> On 22/10/2019 18.24, Wayne Li wrote:
> > If I run "lsmod | grep kvm" nothing shows up but if I just do a "find .
> > -name "kvm"" I get the following:
> [...]
> > ./sys/devices/virtual/misc/kvm
> > ./sys/class/misc/kvm
> > ./sys/kern
And yes that is correct it has the e6500 core using PowerPC.
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 11:24 AM Wayne Li wrote:
> If I run "lsmod | grep kvm" nothing shows up but if I just do a "find .
> -name "kvm"" I get the following:
>
> ./usr/src/kernel/Documentati
2, 2019 at 2:04 AM Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 21/10/2019 23.06, Wayne Li wrote:
> > Dear Qemu list members,
> >
> > I'm attempting to enable KVM in a Qemu-based project that is running on
> > a T4240RDB board. After compiling my code with the -enable-kvm option
Dear Qemu list members,
I'm attempting to enable KVM in a Qemu-based project that is running on a
T4240RDB board. After compiling my code with the -enable-kvm option I ran
the qemu executable with the -enable-kvm option. The application exited
with the following error message: "kvm error:
16 matches
Mail list logo
