On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 05:24:10PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:19:22PM -0500, Ben Taylor wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 03:53:46PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Content-Description: message body text
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 03:02:21PM +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange a écrit :
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 11:43:33PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Laurent Vivier [EMAIL PROTECTED](none)
This patch allows to define where is connected the CDROM device (bus,
unit).
It
on x86, qemu by default does not emulate a scsi device.
if you look at my last set of postings, you will see a patch set for adding
scsi controllers on demand.
its got some code formatting issues, so i understand why it hasnt been merged
as of yet. i intend to publish a new version in the next
the attached patch is a re-hash of the old -disk patch against current CVS.
things it does(on X86):
adds a -disk scsi,hba=ADAPTER_NO,id=SCSI_ID,img=DISK_IMAGE,type=disk syntax,
for specifying scsi devices.
supports the old -hd[a-d] arguments.
supports using -cdrom twice, creating two cdrom
Lets try this again. (forgot to attach patch! )
the attached patch is a re-hash of the old -disk patch against current CVS.
things it does(on X86):
adds a -disk scsi,hba=ADAPTER_NO,id=SCSI_ID,img=DISK_IMAGE,type=disk syntax,
for specifying scsi devices.
supports the old -hd[a-d] arguments.
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:10:02AM -0400, Ben Taylor wrote:
I've been keeping up with CVS patches for qemu about once a week. I just
updated
tonight after the big round of patches that have been commited and am seeing a
consistent failure with my existing ubuntu-7.04 32-bit guest on
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:44:39PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
Hi,
I found a bug in the subpage checking code. Could you try if the
attached patch fixes the problem?
thats a negative. the exact same behavior as before.
qemu: fatal: Trying to execute code outside RAM or ROM at 0xfff0
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 10:33:37PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
On 5/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:44:39PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
Hi,
I found a bug in the subpage checking code. Could you try if the
attached patch fixes the problem?
thats a