On 21/08/2019 17.53, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> The ordering of events that are emitted during the rmdir
> test have changed with kernel >= 5.3. Semantically both
> new & old orderings are correct, so we must be able to
> cope with either.
>
> To cope with this, when we see an unexpected event,
On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:53:27 +0100
Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> The ordering of events that are emitted during the rmdir
> test have changed with kernel >= 5.3. Semantically both
> new & old orderings are correct, so we must be able to
> cope with either.
>
> To cope with this, when we see an
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 04:53:27PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> The ordering of events that are emitted during the rmdir
> test have changed with kernel >= 5.3. Semantically both
> new & old orderings are correct, so we must be able to
> cope with either.
>
> To cope with this, when we see
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 04:53:27PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>The ordering of events that are emitted during the rmdir
>test have changed with kernel >= 5.3. Semantically both
>new & old orderings are correct, so we must be able to
>cope with either.
>
>To cope with this, when we see an
The ordering of events that are emitted during the rmdir
test have changed with kernel >= 5.3. Semantically both
new & old orderings are correct, so we must be able to
cope with either.
To cope with this, when we see an unexpected event, we
push it back onto the queue and look and the subsequent
