Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] target-ppc: move POWER7+ to a separate family

2013-11-18 Thread Alexey Kardashevskiy
On 11/12/2013 06:18 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: On 11/09/2013 11:20 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: On 11/09/2013 03:59 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: Am 08.11.2013 15:54, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy: On 11/09/2013 12:44 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: Am 08.11.2013 03:37, schrieb Alexey

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] target-ppc: move POWER7+ to a separate family

2013-11-18 Thread Alexander Graf
On 18.11.2013, at 03:55, Alexey Kardashevskiy a...@ozlabs.ru wrote: On 11/12/2013 06:18 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: On 11/09/2013 11:20 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: On 11/09/2013 03:59 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: Am 08.11.2013 15:54, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy: On 11/09/2013 12:44

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] target-ppc: move POWER7+ to a separate family

2013-11-11 Thread Alexey Kardashevskiy
On 11/09/2013 11:20 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: On 11/09/2013 03:59 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: Am 08.11.2013 15:54, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy: On 11/09/2013 12:44 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: Am 08.11.2013 03:37, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy: So far POWER7+ was a part of POWER7 family.

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] target-ppc: move POWER7+ to a separate family

2013-11-08 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 08.11.2013 03:37, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy: So far POWER7+ was a part of POWER7 family. However it has a different PVR base value so in order to support PVR masks, it needs a separate family class. Alexey, Another reason to make a POWER7+ family is that its name in the device tree

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] target-ppc: move POWER7+ to a separate family

2013-11-08 Thread Alexey Kardashevskiy
On 11/09/2013 12:44 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: Am 08.11.2013 03:37, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy: So far POWER7+ was a part of POWER7 family. However it has a different PVR base value so in order to support PVR masks, it needs a separate family class. Alexey, Another reason to make a

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] target-ppc: move POWER7+ to a separate family

2013-11-08 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 08.11.2013 15:54, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy: On 11/09/2013 12:44 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: Am 08.11.2013 03:37, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy: So far POWER7+ was a part of POWER7 family. However it has a different PVR base value so in order to support PVR masks, it needs a separate

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] target-ppc: move POWER7+ to a separate family

2013-11-08 Thread Alexey Kardashevskiy
On 11/09/2013 03:59 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: Am 08.11.2013 15:54, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy: On 11/09/2013 12:44 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: Am 08.11.2013 03:37, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy: So far POWER7+ was a part of POWER7 family. However it has a different PVR base value so in order

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] target-ppc: move POWER7+ to a separate family

2013-11-07 Thread Alexey Kardashevskiy
So far POWER7+ was a part of POWER7 family. However it has a different PVR base value so in order to support PVR masks, it needs a separate family class. Another reason to make a POWER7+ family is that its name in the device tree (/proc/device-tree/cpus/cpu*) should be Power7+ but not Power7 and