On 11/12/2013 06:18 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 11/09/2013 11:20 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 11/09/2013 03:59 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 08.11.2013 15:54, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy:
On 11/09/2013 12:44 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 08.11.2013 03:37, schrieb Alexey
On 18.11.2013, at 03:55, Alexey Kardashevskiy a...@ozlabs.ru wrote:
On 11/12/2013 06:18 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 11/09/2013 11:20 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 11/09/2013 03:59 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 08.11.2013 15:54, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy:
On 11/09/2013 12:44
On 11/09/2013 11:20 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 11/09/2013 03:59 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 08.11.2013 15:54, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy:
On 11/09/2013 12:44 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 08.11.2013 03:37, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy:
So far POWER7+ was a part of POWER7 family.
Am 08.11.2013 03:37, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy:
So far POWER7+ was a part of POWER7 family. However it has a different
PVR base value so in order to support PVR masks, it needs a separate
family class.
Alexey,
Another reason to make a POWER7+ family is that its name in the device
tree
On 11/09/2013 12:44 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 08.11.2013 03:37, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy:
So far POWER7+ was a part of POWER7 family. However it has a different
PVR base value so in order to support PVR masks, it needs a separate
family class.
Alexey,
Another reason to make a
Am 08.11.2013 15:54, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy:
On 11/09/2013 12:44 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 08.11.2013 03:37, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy:
So far POWER7+ was a part of POWER7 family. However it has a different
PVR base value so in order to support PVR masks, it needs a separate
On 11/09/2013 03:59 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 08.11.2013 15:54, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy:
On 11/09/2013 12:44 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 08.11.2013 03:37, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy:
So far POWER7+ was a part of POWER7 family. However it has a different
PVR base value so in order
So far POWER7+ was a part of POWER7 family. However it has a different
PVR base value so in order to support PVR masks, it needs a separate
family class.
Another reason to make a POWER7+ family is that its name in the device
tree (/proc/device-tree/cpus/cpu*) should be Power7+ but not Power7
and