Re: [Qemu-devel] New targets (was: [PATCH] qapi-schema.json: Reformat TargetType enum to one-per-line)

2013-05-22 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 22.05.2013 16:28, schrieb Anthony Liguori: Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de writes: More common is however that people start writing a new target and don't submit it yet (ahem!) while another target gets added, and the current form of rebreaking this block of enum values causes more

Re: [Qemu-devel] New targets (was: [PATCH] qapi-schema.json: Reformat TargetType enum to one-per-line)

2013-05-22 Thread Anthony Liguori
Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de writes: Am 22.05.2013 16:28, schrieb Anthony Liguori: Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de writes: More common is however that people start writing a new target and don't submit it yet (ahem!) while another target gets added, and the current form of rebreaking this

Re: [Qemu-devel] New targets (was: [PATCH] qapi-schema.json: Reformat TargetType enum to one-per-line)

2013-05-22 Thread Peter Maydell
On 22 May 2013 15:48, Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com wrote: Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de writes: Am 22.05.2013 16:28, schrieb Anthony Liguori: So are incompletely implemented targets (wrt instruction set) eligible for upstream these days? Aren't most of our target incomplete by some

Re: [Qemu-devel] New targets (was: [PATCH] qapi-schema.json: Reformat TargetType enum to one-per-line)

2013-05-22 Thread Anthony Liguori
Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org writes: On 22 May 2013 15:48, Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com wrote: Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de writes: Am 22.05.2013 16:28, schrieb Anthony Liguori: So are incompletely implemented targets (wrt instruction set) eligible for upstream these