Am 11.09.2019 um 13:00 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> On 11.09.19 12:31, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 11.09.2019 um 12:00 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> >> So all in all I think it’s best to make the callback mandatory and add
> >> two global helper functions. That’s simple enough and should prevent
> >>
On 11.09.19 12:31, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 11.09.2019 um 12:00 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
>> On 11.09.19 10:27, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> Am 11.09.2019 um 09:37 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
On 11.09.19 08:55, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Well, by default the primary child, which should cover like 90% of
Am 11.09.2019 um 12:00 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> On 11.09.19 10:27, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 11.09.2019 um 09:37 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> >> On 11.09.19 08:55, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >>> Well, by default the primary child, which should cover like 90% of the
> >>> drivers?
> >>
> >> Hm, yes.
>
On 11.09.19 10:27, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 11.09.2019 um 09:37 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
>> On 11.09.19 08:55, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> Am 11.09.2019 um 08:20 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
On 10.09.19 16:52, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 09.08.2019 um 18:13 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
>> If the
Am 11.09.2019 um 09:37 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> On 11.09.19 08:55, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 11.09.2019 um 08:20 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> >> On 10.09.19 16:52, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >>> Am 09.08.2019 um 18:13 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> If the driver does not implement
On 11.09.19 08:55, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 11.09.2019 um 08:20 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
>> On 10.09.19 16:52, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> Am 09.08.2019 um 18:13 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
If the driver does not implement bdrv_get_allocated_file_size(), we
should fall back to cumulating the
Am 11.09.2019 um 08:20 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> On 10.09.19 16:52, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 09.08.2019 um 18:13 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> >> If the driver does not implement bdrv_get_allocated_file_size(), we
> >> should fall back to cumulating the allocated size of all non-COW
> >>
On 10.09.19 16:52, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 09.08.2019 um 18:13 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
>> If the driver does not implement bdrv_get_allocated_file_size(), we
>> should fall back to cumulating the allocated size of all non-COW
>> children instead of just bs->file.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Vladimir
Am 09.08.2019 um 18:13 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> If the driver does not implement bdrv_get_allocated_file_size(), we
> should fall back to cumulating the allocated size of all non-COW
> children instead of just bs->file.
>
> Suggested-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
> Signed-off-by: Max
On 12.08.19 19:14, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 12.08.2019 16:09, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 10.08.19 18:41, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>> 09.08.2019 19:13, Max Reitz wrote:
If the driver does not implement bdrv_get_allocated_file_size(), we
should fall back to cumulating
12.08.2019 16:09, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 10.08.19 18:41, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> 09.08.2019 19:13, Max Reitz wrote:
>>> If the driver does not implement bdrv_get_allocated_file_size(), we
>>> should fall back to cumulating the allocated size of all non-COW
>>> children instead of
On 10.08.19 18:41, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 09.08.2019 19:13, Max Reitz wrote:
>> If the driver does not implement bdrv_get_allocated_file_size(), we
>> should fall back to cumulating the allocated size of all non-COW
>> children instead of just bs->file.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Vladimir
09.08.2019 19:13, Max Reitz wrote:
> If the driver does not implement bdrv_get_allocated_file_size(), we
> should fall back to cumulating the allocated size of all non-COW
> children instead of just bs->file.
>
> Suggested-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz
> ---
>
13 matches
Mail list logo