On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 at 17:38, Michele Denber wrote:
>
> Oops, I hit Send before I was done. I tried the Haiku patch:
>
> diff --git a/util/Makefile.objs b/util/Makefile.objs
> index cc5e37177a..faebc13fac 100644
> --- a/util/Makefile.objs
> +++ b/util/Makefile.objs
> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ util-obj-y
Oops, I hit Send before I was done. I tried the Haiku patch:
diff --git a/util/Makefile.objs b/util/Makefile.objs
index cc5e37177a..faebc13fac 100644
--- a/util/Makefile.objs
+++ b/util/Makefile.objs
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ util-obj-y += qsp.o
util-obj-y += range.o
util-obj-y += stats64.o
On 07/03/20 01:11, Thomas Huth wrote:
Did you have a local modification to that file?
Oops yes, I had changed the line
static int openpty(int *amaster, int *aslave, char *name,
struct termios *termp, struct winsize *winp)
to
int openpty(int *amaster, int *aslave, char
On 02/07/2020 23.33, Michele Denber wrote:
On 07/02/20 13:34, Thomas Huth wrote:
That's just the context, cut at three lines after the last change.
Simply try to apply the patch with "patch -p1 -i ..." or "git am" in a
separate git branch if you're using git. It should hopefully apply
On 07/02/20 13:34, Thomas Huth wrote:
That's just the context, cut at three lines after the last change.
Simply try to apply the patch with "patch -p1 -i ..." or "git am" in a
separate git branch if you're using git. It should hopefully apply
cleanly.
Looks like it partly worked:
On 02/07/2020 16.46, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 04:39:55PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
Recent versions of Solaris (v11.4) now feature an openpty() function,
too, causing a build failure since we ship our own implementation of
openpty() for Solaris in util/qemu-openpty.c so
On 02/07/2020 18.13, Michele Denber wrote:
On 07/02/20 10:39, Thomas Huth wrote:
Recent versions of Solaris (v11.4) now feature an openpty() function,
too, causing a build failure since we ship our own implementation of
openpty() for Solaris in util/qemu-openpty.c so far. Since there are
now
On 07/02/20 10:39, Thomas Huth wrote:
Recent versions of Solaris (v11.4) now feature an openpty() function,
too, causing a build failure since we ship our own implementation of
openpty() for Solaris in util/qemu-openpty.c so far. Since there are
now both variants available in the wild, with
On 07/02/20 10:46, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 04:39:55PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
Recent versions of Solaris (v11.4) now feature an openpty() function,
too, causing a build failure since we ship our own implementation of
openpty() for Solaris in util/qemu-openpty.c so
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 04:39:55PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> Recent versions of Solaris (v11.4) now feature an openpty() function,
> too, causing a build failure since we ship our own implementation of
> openpty() for Solaris in util/qemu-openpty.c so far. Since there are
> now both variants
Recent versions of Solaris (v11.4) now feature an openpty() function,
too, causing a build failure since we ship our own implementation of
openpty() for Solaris in util/qemu-openpty.c so far. Since there are
now both variants available in the wild, with and without this function,
let's introduce a
11 matches
Mail list logo
