Re: [PATCH] virtio: reset device on bad guest index in virtio_load()

2020-12-02 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 06:51:07PM +, John Levon wrote:
> 
> If we find a queue with an inconsistent guest index value, explicitly mark the
> device as needing a reset - and broken - via virtio_error().
> 
> There's at least one driver implementation - the virtio-win NetKVM driver - 
> that
> is able to handle a VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET notification and successfully
> restore the device to a working state. Other implementations do not correctly
> handle this, but as the VQ is not in a functional state anyway, this is still
> worth doing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Levon 

I tagged this for after the release. pls ping me after the release
to help make sure it does not get lost.

> ---
>  hw/virtio/virtio.c | 15 +--
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> index ceb58fda6c..eff35fab7c 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> @@ -3161,12 +3161,15 @@ int virtio_load(VirtIODevice *vdev, QEMUFile *f, int 
> version_id)
>  nheads = vring_avail_idx(>vq[i]) - 
> vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx;
>  /* Check it isn't doing strange things with descriptor numbers. 
> */
>  if (nheads > vdev->vq[i].vring.num) {
> -qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
> -  "VQ %d size 0x%x Guest index 0x%x "
> -  "inconsistent with Host index 0x%x: delta 
> 0x%x",
> -  i, vdev->vq[i].vring.num,
> -  vring_avail_idx(>vq[i]),
> -  vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx, nheads);
> +virtio_error(vdev, "VQ %d size 0x%x Guest index 0x%x "
> + "inconsistent with Host index 0x%x: delta 0x%x",
> + i, vdev->vq[i].vring.num,
> + vring_avail_idx(>vq[i]),
> + vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx, nheads);
> +vdev->vq[i].used_idx = 0;
> +vdev->vq[i].shadow_avail_idx = 0;
> +vdev->vq[i].inuse = 0;
> +continue;
>  }
>  vdev->vq[i].used_idx = vring_used_idx(>vq[i]);
>  vdev->vq[i].shadow_avail_idx = vring_avail_idx(>vq[i]);
> -- 
> 2.22.3
> 




Re: [PATCH] virtio: reset device on bad guest index in virtio_load()

2020-11-30 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin


No, but how about sending the patch to me and the mailing list?
I didn't get it through either channel.

On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 03:51:13PM +, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 06:51:07PM +, John Levon wrote:
> 
> > If we find a queue with an inconsistent guest index value, explicitly mark 
> > the
> > device as needing a reset - and broken - via virtio_error().
> > 
> > There's at least one driver implementation - the virtio-win NetKVM driver - 
> > that
> > is able to handle a VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET notification and 
> > successfully
> > restore the device to a working state. Other implementations do not 
> > correctly
> > handle this, but as the VQ is not in a functional state anyway, this is 
> > still
> > worth doing.
> 
> Ping, anyone have issues with doing this?
> 
> cheers
> john
> 
> > Signed-off-by: John Levon 
> > ---
> >  hw/virtio/virtio.c | 15 +--
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> > index ceb58fda6c..eff35fab7c 100644
> > --- a/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> > +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> > @@ -3161,12 +3161,15 @@ int virtio_load(VirtIODevice *vdev, QEMUFile *f, 
> > int version_id)
> >  nheads = vring_avail_idx(>vq[i]) - 
> > vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx;
> >  /* Check it isn't doing strange things with descriptor 
> > numbers. */
> >  if (nheads > vdev->vq[i].vring.num) {
> > -qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
> > -  "VQ %d size 0x%x Guest index 0x%x "
> > -  "inconsistent with Host index 0x%x: delta 
> > 0x%x",
> > -  i, vdev->vq[i].vring.num,
> > -  vring_avail_idx(>vq[i]),
> > -  vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx, nheads);
> > +virtio_error(vdev, "VQ %d size 0x%x Guest index 0x%x "
> > + "inconsistent with Host index 0x%x: delta 
> > 0x%x",
> > + i, vdev->vq[i].vring.num,
> > + vring_avail_idx(>vq[i]),
> > + vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx, nheads);
> > +vdev->vq[i].used_idx = 0;
> > +vdev->vq[i].shadow_avail_idx = 0;
> > +vdev->vq[i].inuse = 0;
> > +continue;
> >  }
> >  vdev->vq[i].used_idx = vring_used_idx(>vq[i]);
> >  vdev->vq[i].shadow_avail_idx = vring_avail_idx(>vq[i]);




Re: [PATCH] virtio: reset device on bad guest index in virtio_load()

2020-11-30 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 06:51:07PM +, John Levon wrote:

> If we find a queue with an inconsistent guest index value, explicitly mark the
> device as needing a reset - and broken - via virtio_error().
> 
> There's at least one driver implementation - the virtio-win NetKVM driver - 
> that
> is able to handle a VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET notification and successfully
> restore the device to a working state. Other implementations do not correctly
> handle this, but as the VQ is not in a functional state anyway, this is still
> worth doing.

Ping, anyone have issues with doing this?

cheers
john

> Signed-off-by: John Levon 
> ---
>  hw/virtio/virtio.c | 15 +--
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> index ceb58fda6c..eff35fab7c 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> @@ -3161,12 +3161,15 @@ int virtio_load(VirtIODevice *vdev, QEMUFile *f, int 
> version_id)
>  nheads = vring_avail_idx(>vq[i]) - 
> vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx;
>  /* Check it isn't doing strange things with descriptor numbers. 
> */
>  if (nheads > vdev->vq[i].vring.num) {
> -qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
> -  "VQ %d size 0x%x Guest index 0x%x "
> -  "inconsistent with Host index 0x%x: delta 
> 0x%x",
> -  i, vdev->vq[i].vring.num,
> -  vring_avail_idx(>vq[i]),
> -  vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx, nheads);
> +virtio_error(vdev, "VQ %d size 0x%x Guest index 0x%x "
> + "inconsistent with Host index 0x%x: delta 0x%x",
> + i, vdev->vq[i].vring.num,
> + vring_avail_idx(>vq[i]),
> + vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx, nheads);
> +vdev->vq[i].used_idx = 0;
> +vdev->vq[i].shadow_avail_idx = 0;
> +vdev->vq[i].inuse = 0;
> +continue;
>  }
>  vdev->vq[i].used_idx = vring_used_idx(>vq[i]);
>  vdev->vq[i].shadow_avail_idx = vring_avail_idx(>vq[i]);



[PATCH] virtio: reset device on bad guest index in virtio_load()

2020-11-20 Thread John Levon


If we find a queue with an inconsistent guest index value, explicitly mark the
device as needing a reset - and broken - via virtio_error().

There's at least one driver implementation - the virtio-win NetKVM driver - that
is able to handle a VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET notification and successfully
restore the device to a working state. Other implementations do not correctly
handle this, but as the VQ is not in a functional state anyway, this is still
worth doing.

Signed-off-by: John Levon 
---
 hw/virtio/virtio.c | 15 +--
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
index ceb58fda6c..eff35fab7c 100644
--- a/hw/virtio/virtio.c
+++ b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
@@ -3161,12 +3161,15 @@ int virtio_load(VirtIODevice *vdev, QEMUFile *f, int 
version_id)
 nheads = vring_avail_idx(>vq[i]) - 
vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx;
 /* Check it isn't doing strange things with descriptor numbers. */
 if (nheads > vdev->vq[i].vring.num) {
-qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
-  "VQ %d size 0x%x Guest index 0x%x "
-  "inconsistent with Host index 0x%x: delta 0x%x",
-  i, vdev->vq[i].vring.num,
-  vring_avail_idx(>vq[i]),
-  vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx, nheads);
+virtio_error(vdev, "VQ %d size 0x%x Guest index 0x%x "
+ "inconsistent with Host index 0x%x: delta 0x%x",
+ i, vdev->vq[i].vring.num,
+ vring_avail_idx(>vq[i]),
+ vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx, nheads);
+vdev->vq[i].used_idx = 0;
+vdev->vq[i].shadow_avail_idx = 0;
+vdev->vq[i].inuse = 0;
+continue;
 }
 vdev->vq[i].used_idx = vring_used_idx(>vq[i]);
 vdev->vq[i].shadow_avail_idx = vring_avail_idx(>vq[i]);
-- 
2.22.3



[PATCH] virtio: reset device on bad guest index in virtio_load()

2020-11-20 Thread John Levon


If we find a queue with an inconsistent guest index value, explicitly mark the
device as needing a reset - and broken - via virtio_error().

There's at least one driver implementation - the virtio-win NetKVM driver - that
is able to handle a VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_NEEDS_RESET notification and successfully
restore the device to a working state. Other implementations do not correctly
handle this, but as the VQ is not in a functional state anyway, this is still
worth doing.

Signed-off-by: John Levon 
---
 hw/virtio/virtio.c | 15 +--
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
index ceb58fda6c..eff35fab7c 100644
--- a/hw/virtio/virtio.c
+++ b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
@@ -3161,12 +3161,15 @@ int virtio_load(VirtIODevice *vdev, QEMUFile *f, int 
version_id)
 nheads = vring_avail_idx(>vq[i]) - 
vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx;
 /* Check it isn't doing strange things with descriptor numbers. */
 if (nheads > vdev->vq[i].vring.num) {
-qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
-  "VQ %d size 0x%x Guest index 0x%x "
-  "inconsistent with Host index 0x%x: delta 0x%x",
-  i, vdev->vq[i].vring.num,
-  vring_avail_idx(>vq[i]),
-  vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx, nheads);
+virtio_error(vdev, "VQ %d size 0x%x Guest index 0x%x "
+ "inconsistent with Host index 0x%x: delta 0x%x",
+ i, vdev->vq[i].vring.num,
+ vring_avail_idx(>vq[i]),
+ vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx, nheads);
+vdev->vq[i].used_idx = 0;
+vdev->vq[i].shadow_avail_idx = 0;
+vdev->vq[i].inuse = 0;
+continue;
 }
 vdev->vq[i].used_idx = vring_used_idx(>vq[i]);
 vdev->vq[i].shadow_avail_idx = vring_avail_idx(>vq[i]);
-- 
2.22.3