Peter Maydell writes:
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 at 10:45, Aleksandar Markovic
> wrote:
>> I think it is also a little problematic that tests like this reside
>> and belong in tests/tcg - since they deal more with elements
>> of kernel interface (system call prctl()), rather than TCG.
>> Still, I
>
> On 3/16/20 6:21 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
> > This is a fairly bare-bones test of setting the various vector sizes...
The title contains a typo "iotcl" (you meant "ioctl"), but in any case,
as I wrote in another mail, "prctl" is the right choice.
> > for SVE which will only fail if the
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 at 10:45, Aleksandar Markovic
wrote:
> I think it is also a little problematic that tests like this reside
> and belong in tests/tcg - since they deal more with elements
> of kernel interface (system call prctl()), rather than TCG.
> Still, I see there are many other similar
уто, 17. мар 2020. у 11:33 Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
је написао/ла:
>
> On 3/16/20 6:21 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
> > This is a fairly bare-bones test of setting the various vector sizes
> > for SVE which will only fail if the PR_SVE_SET_VL can't reduce the
> > user-space vector length by powers of 2.
On 3/16/20 6:21 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
This is a fairly bare-bones test of setting the various vector sizes
for SVE which will only fail if the PR_SVE_SET_VL can't reduce the
user-space vector length by powers of 2.
However we will also be able to use it in a future test which
exercises the GDB
This is a fairly bare-bones test of setting the various vector sizes
for SVE which will only fail if the PR_SVE_SET_VL can't reduce the
user-space vector length by powers of 2.
However we will also be able to use it in a future test which
exercises the GDB stub.
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée
---
