On 3/16/2020 6:24 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 16/03/20 11:19, Zhang, Cathy wrote:
Yes, I see they are already in master, but not in v4.2 yet, so will they
be in the next release v5.0?
Yes, that's what master will become.
Paolo
That's great! Thanks for your response!
On 3/16/2020 4:41 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 16/03/20 02:39, Zhang, Cathy wrote:
On 1/7/2020 9:31 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 25/12/19 07:30, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
Current Cooperlake CPU model lacks VMX features which are introduced
by Paolo
several months ago, and it also lacks 2 security
On 16/03/20 11:19, Zhang, Cathy wrote:
> Yes, I see they are already in master, but not in v4.2 yet, so will they
> be in the next release v5.0?
Yes, that's what master will become.
Paolo
On 16/03/20 02:39, Zhang, Cathy wrote:
> On 1/7/2020 9:31 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 25/12/19 07:30, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
>>> Current Cooperlake CPU model lacks VMX features which are introduced
>>> by Paolo
>>> several months ago, and it also lacks 2 security features in
>>>
On 1/7/2020 9:31 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 25/12/19 07:30, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
Current Cooperlake CPU model lacks VMX features which are introduced by Paolo
several months ago, and it also lacks 2 security features in
MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES disclosed recently.
Xiaoyao Li (2):
On 25/12/19 07:30, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
> Current Cooperlake CPU model lacks VMX features which are introduced by Paolo
> several months ago, and it also lacks 2 security features in
> MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES disclosed recently.
>
> Xiaoyao Li (2):
> target/i386: Add new bit definitions of
Current Cooperlake CPU model lacks VMX features which are introduced by Paolo
several months ago, and it also lacks 2 security features in
MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES disclosed recently.
Xiaoyao Li (2):
target/i386: Add new bit definitions of MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES
target/i386: Add missed
