> On 27-Feb-2024, at 21:17, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>
> Unfortunately having 2.0 machine type deprecated is not enough
> to get rid of legacy SMBIOS handling since 'isapc' also uses
> that and it's staying around.
>
> Hence add test for CLI options handling to be sure that it
> ain't broken
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 16:41:22 +0530
Ani Sinha wrote:
> > On 27-Feb-2024, at 21:17, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately having 2.0 machine type deprecated is not enough
> > to get rid of legacy SMBIOS handling since 'isapc' also uses
> > that and it's staying around.
> >
> > Hence add
> On 27-Feb-2024, at 21:17, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>
> Unfortunately having 2.0 machine type deprecated is not enough
> to get rid of legacy SMBIOS handling since 'isapc' also uses
> that and it's staying around.
>
> Hence add test for CLI options handling to be sure that it
> ain't broken
Unfortunately having 2.0 machine type deprecated is not enough
to get rid of legacy SMBIOS handling since 'isapc' also uses
that and it's staying around.
Hence add test for CLI options handling to be sure that it
ain't broken during SMBIOS code refactoring.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov
---
