On Mon, 15 Jun 2020, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 at 17:40, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jun 2020, Peter Maydell wrote:
The calculations for sb/se/db/de all have a term which
multiplies by (width + pitch), which makes me suspect
they also need a similar fix ?
Maybe. I'll
On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 at 17:40, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
>
> On Mon, 15 Jun 2020, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > The calculations for sb/se/db/de all have a term which
> > multiplies by (width + pitch), which makes me suspect
> > they also need a similar fix ?
>
> Maybe. I'll have to check again. Actually
On Mon, 15 Jun 2020, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2020 at 20:22, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
We don't need to add width to pitch when calculating last point, that
would reject valid ops within the card's local_mem.
Fixes: b15a22bbcbe6a78dc3d88fe3134985e4cdd87de4
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan
On Sat, 6 Jun 2020 at 20:22, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
>
> We don't need to add width to pitch when calculating last point, that
> would reject valid ops within the card's local_mem.
>
> Fixes: b15a22bbcbe6a78dc3d88fe3134985e4cdd87de4
> Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan
> ---
> hw/display/sm501.c | 8
We don't need to add width to pitch when calculating last point, that
would reject valid ops within the card's local_mem.
Fixes: b15a22bbcbe6a78dc3d88fe3134985e4cdd87de4
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan
---
hw/display/sm501.c | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff
