On 1/14/22 12:29, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
On 1/14/22 07:46, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 1/13/22 20:29, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
One of the remaining dependencies we have on the PnvPhb4PecStack object
is the stack->stack_no property. This is set as the position the stack
occupies
On 1/14/22 07:46, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 1/13/22 20:29, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
One of the remaining dependencies we have on the PnvPhb4PecStack object
is the stack->stack_no property. This is set as the position the stack
occupies in the pec->stacks[] array.
We need a way to
On 1/13/22 20:29, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
One of the remaining dependencies we have on the PnvPhb4PecStack object
is the stack->stack_no property. This is set as the position the stack
occupies in the pec->stacks[] array.
We need a way to report this same value in the PnvPHB4. This patch
One of the remaining dependencies we have on the PnvPhb4PecStack object
is the stack->stack_no property. This is set as the position the stack
occupies in the pec->stacks[] array.
We need a way to report this same value in the PnvPHB4. This patch
creates a new property called 'phb_number' to be
