On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 09:09:12PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 16.03.2021 19:03, Roman Kagan wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 11:10:14PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
> > wrote:
> > > 15.03.2021 09:06, Roman Kagan wrote:
> > > > The reconnection logic doesn't need to stop
16.03.2021 19:03, Roman Kagan wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 11:10:14PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
15.03.2021 09:06, Roman Kagan wrote:
The reconnection logic doesn't need to stop while in a drained section.
Moreover it has to be active during the drained section, as the
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 11:10:14PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 15.03.2021 09:06, Roman Kagan wrote:
> > The reconnection logic doesn't need to stop while in a drained section.
> > Moreover it has to be active during the drained section, as the requests
> > that were caught
15.03.2021 09:06, Roman Kagan wrote:
The reconnection logic doesn't need to stop while in a drained section.
Moreover it has to be active during the drained section, as the requests
that were caught in-flight with the connection to the server broken can
only usefully get drained if the
The reconnection logic doesn't need to stop while in a drained section.
Moreover it has to be active during the drained section, as the requests
that were caught in-flight with the connection to the server broken can
only usefully get drained if the connection is restored. Otherwise such
requests
