On 07/01/20 10:24, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 10:28:56 +0300
> Denis Plotnikov wrote:
>
>> 5.0 machine type uses 4.2 compats. This seems to be incorrect, since
>> the latests machine type by now is 5.0 and it should use its own
>> compat or shouldn't use any relying on the
On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 10:28:56 +0300
Denis Plotnikov wrote:
> 5.0 machine type uses 4.2 compats. This seems to be incorrect, since
> the latests machine type by now is 5.0 and it should use its own
> compat or shouldn't use any relying on the defaults.
> Seems, like this appeared because of some
On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 10:28:56 +0300
Denis Plotnikov wrote:
> 5.0 machine type uses 4.2 compats. This seems to be incorrect, since
> the latests machine type by now is 5.0 and it should use its own
> compat or shouldn't use any relying on the defaults.
> Seems, like this appeared because of some
5.0 machine type uses 4.2 compats. This seems to be incorrect, since
the latests machine type by now is 5.0 and it should use its own
compat or shouldn't use any relying on the defaults.
Seems, like this appeared because of some problems on merge/rebase.
Signed-off-by: Denis Plotnikov
---
