On 09.09.2021 11:28, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 06:20:49PM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
On 08.09.2021 16:22, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
Message bounced, I use new Denis's email address.
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 03:17:16PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
Hi Denis,
I
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 06:20:49PM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
On 08.09.2021 16:22, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
Message bounced, I use new Denis's email address.
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 03:17:16PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
Hi Denis,
I just found this discussion since we still have the
On 08.09.2021 16:22, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
Message bounced, I use new Denis's email address.
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 03:17:16PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
Hi Denis,
I just found this discussion since we still have the following line
in hw/core/machine.c:
{ "vhost-blk-device",
Message bounced, I use new Denis's email address.
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 03:17:16PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
Hi Denis,
I just found this discussion since we still have the following line in
hw/core/machine.c:
{ "vhost-blk-device", "seg_max_adjust", "off"}
IIUC it was a typo, and
Hi Denis,
I just found this discussion since we still have the following line in
hw/core/machine.c:
{ "vhost-blk-device", "seg_max_adjust", "off"}
IIUC it was a typo, and I think we should fix it since in the future we
can have `vhost-blk-device`.
So, I think we have 2 options:
1.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 06:34:15PM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
>
>
> On 09.02.2020 10:49, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 11:48:05AM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
> > >
> > > On 05.02.2020 14:19, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 12:59:04PM +0300,
On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 02:49:09AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 11:48:05AM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
> > On 05.02.2020 14:19, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 12:59:04PM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
> > > > On 30.01.2020 17:58, Stefan Hajnoczi
On 09.02.2020 10:49, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 11:48:05AM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
On 05.02.2020 14:19, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 12:59:04PM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
On 30.01.2020 17:58, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 11:48:05AM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
>
>
> On 05.02.2020 14:19, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 12:59:04PM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
> > >
> > > On 30.01.2020 17:58, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 05:07:00PM +0300, Denis
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 11:48:05AM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
>
>
> On 05.02.2020 14:19, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 12:59:04PM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
> > >
> > > On 30.01.2020 17:58, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 05:07:00PM +0300, Denis
On 05.02.2020 14:19, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 12:59:04PM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
On 30.01.2020 17:58, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 05:07:00PM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
The goal is to reduce the amount of requests issued by a guest on
1M
On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 12:59:04PM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
>
>
> On 30.01.2020 17:58, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 05:07:00PM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
> > > The goal is to reduce the amount of requests issued by a guest on
> > > 1M reads/writes. This rises the
On 30.01.2020 17:58, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 05:07:00PM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
The goal is to reduce the amount of requests issued by a guest on
1M reads/writes. This rises the performance up to 4% on that kind of
disk access pattern.
The maximum chunk size to
On 30.01.2020 16:40, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 05:07:00PM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
The goal is to reduce the amount of requests issued by a guest on
1M reads/writes. This rises the performance up to 4% on that kind of
disk access pattern.
The maximum chunk size
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 05:07:00PM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
> The goal is to reduce the amount of requests issued by a guest on
> 1M reads/writes. This rises the performance up to 4% on that kind of
> disk access pattern.
>
> The maximum chunk size to be used for the guest disk accessing is
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 05:07:00PM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
> The goal is to reduce the amount of requests issued by a guest on
> 1M reads/writes. This rises the performance up to 4% on that kind of
> disk access pattern.
>
> The maximum chunk size to be used for the guest disk accessing is
The goal is to reduce the amount of requests issued by a guest on
1M reads/writes. This rises the performance up to 4% on that kind of
disk access pattern.
The maximum chunk size to be used for the guest disk accessing is
limited with seg_max parameter, which represents the max amount of
pices in
17 matches
Mail list logo
