Hi Jonathan,
Thank you! I will fix them and send a V11 soon.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 6:37 AM Jonathan Cameron
wrote:
>
>
>
> > > > @@ -858,7 +910,8 @@ static int __init memory_tier_init(void)
> > > >* For now we can have 4 faster memory tiers with smaller
> > > > adistance
> > > >
> > > @@ -858,7 +910,8 @@ static int __init memory_tier_init(void)
> > >* For now we can have 4 faster memory tiers with smaller adistance
> > >* than default DRAM tier.
> > >*/
> > > - default_dram_type = alloc_memory_type(MEMTIER_ADISTANCE_DRAM);
> > > +
Hi Jonathan,
Thank you for your feedback. I will fix them (inlined) in the next V11.
On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 10:04 AM Jonathan Cameron
wrote:
>
> A few minor comments inline.
>
> > diff --git a/include/linux/memory-tiers.h b/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
> > index a44c03c2ba3a..16769552a338
A few minor comments inline.
> diff --git a/include/linux/memory-tiers.h b/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
> index a44c03c2ba3a..16769552a338 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
> @@ -140,12 +140,13 @@ static inline int mt_perf_to_adistance(struct
>
The current implementation treats emulated memory devices, such as
CXL1.1 type3 memory, as normal DRAM when they are emulated as normal memory
(E820_TYPE_RAM). However, these emulated devices have different
characteristics than traditional DRAM, making it important to
distinguish them. Thus, we
