On 10/6/23 20:10, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
On 06.10.23 11:56, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 05.10.2023 um 21:55 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben:
On 11.09.23 12:46, Kevin Wolf wrote:
When the permission related BlockDriver callbacks are called, we
are in
the middle of an
On 06.10.23 11:56, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 05.10.2023 um 21:55 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben:
On 11.09.23 12:46, Kevin Wolf wrote:
When the permission related BlockDriver callbacks are called, we are in
the middle of an operation traversing the block graph. Polling in such a
place
Am 05.10.2023 um 21:55 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben:
> On 11.09.23 12:46, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > When the permission related BlockDriver callbacks are called, we are in
> > the middle of an operation traversing the block graph. Polling in such a
> > place is a very bad idea because
On 11.09.23 12:46, Kevin Wolf wrote:
When the permission related BlockDriver callbacks are called, we are in
the middle of an operation traversing the block graph. Polling in such a
place is a very bad idea because the graph could change in unexpected
ways. In the future, callers will also hold
When the permission related BlockDriver callbacks are called, we are in
the middle of an operation traversing the block graph. Polling in such a
place is a very bad idea because the graph could change in unexpected
ways. In the future, callers will also hold the graph lock, which is
likely to turn
