On 1/13/21 7:29 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 06:04:29PM -0500, John Snow wrote:
On 1/13/21 11:12 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
John Snow writes:
...
I think we need to, yes; or we probably really, really want to. Making the
info parameter optional really adds a lot
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 06:04:29PM -0500, John Snow wrote:
> On 1/13/21 11:12 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > John Snow writes:
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: John Snow
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > The event_enum_members change might become irrelevant after a
> > > forthcoming (?) patch by Markus,
On 1/13/21 11:12 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
John Snow writes:
Signed-off-by: John Snow
---
The event_enum_members change might become irrelevant after a
forthcoming (?) patch by Markus, but didn't have it in-hand at time of
publishing.
It's in my "[PATCH 00/11] Drop support for QAPIGen
John Snow writes:
> Signed-off-by: John Snow
>
> ---
>
> The event_enum_members change might become irrelevant after a
> forthcoming (?) patch by Markus, but didn't have it in-hand at time of
> publishing.
It's in my "[PATCH 00/11] Drop support for QAPIGen without a file name",
which includes
Signed-off-by: John Snow
---
The event_enum_members change might become irrelevant after a
forthcoming (?) patch by Markus, but didn't have it in-hand at time of
publishing.
Signed-off-by: John Snow
---
scripts/qapi/events.py | 2 +-
scripts/qapi/schema.py | 25 ++---
