On Donnerstag, 7. Oktober 2021 17:18:03 CEST Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 03:09:16PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > On Mittwoch, 6. Oktober 2021 16:42:34 CEST Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 02:50:07PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > > > On
On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 03:09:16PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 6. Oktober 2021 16:42:34 CEST Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 02:50:07PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > > On Mittwoch, 6. Oktober 2021 13:06:55 CEST Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > > On
On Mittwoch, 6. Oktober 2021 16:42:34 CEST Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 02:50:07PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > On Mittwoch, 6. Oktober 2021 13:06:55 CEST Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 06:32:46PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > > > On
On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 02:50:07PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 6. Oktober 2021 13:06:55 CEST Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 06:32:46PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > > On Dienstag, 5. Oktober 2021 17:10:40 CEST Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > > On
On Mittwoch, 6. Oktober 2021 13:06:55 CEST Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 06:32:46PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > On Dienstag, 5. Oktober 2021 17:10:40 CEST Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 03:15:26PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > > > On
On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 06:32:46PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> On Dienstag, 5. Oktober 2021 17:10:40 CEST Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 03:15:26PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > > On Dienstag, 5. Oktober 2021 14:45:56 CEST Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > > On
On Dienstag, 5. Oktober 2021 17:10:40 CEST Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 03:15:26PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > On Dienstag, 5. Oktober 2021 14:45:56 CEST Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 09:38:04PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > > >
On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 03:15:26PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> On Dienstag, 5. Oktober 2021 14:45:56 CEST Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 09:38:04PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > > Refactor VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE to effectively become a runtime
> > > variable per
On Dienstag, 5. Oktober 2021 14:45:56 CEST Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 09:38:04PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > Refactor VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE to effectively become a runtime
> > variable per virtio user.
>
> virtio user == virtio device model?
Yes
> > Reasons:
> >
On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 09:38:04PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> Refactor VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE to effectively become a runtime
> variable per virtio user.
virtio user == virtio device model?
>
> Reasons:
>
> (1) VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE should reflect the absolute theoretical
> maximum
On Mon, 4 Oct 2021 21:38:04 +0200
Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> Refactor VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE to effectively become a runtime
> variable per virtio user.
>
> Reasons:
>
> (1) VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE should reflect the absolute theoretical
> maximum queue size possible. Which is actually the
Refactor VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE to effectively become a runtime
variable per virtio user.
Reasons:
(1) VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE should reflect the absolute theoretical
maximum queue size possible. Which is actually the maximum
queue size allowed by the virtio protocol. The appropriate
value
12 matches
Mail list logo