On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 06:14:26PM +0300, Liran Alon wrote:
> As almost two weeks have passed since this Reviewed-By comment, can I assume
> this series is done from my perspective and ready to be merged?
> As I haven't seen a Reviewed-By for the rest of the patches of this series.
>
> Thanks,
As almost two weeks have passed since this Reviewed-By comment, can I
assume this series is done from my perspective and ready to be merged?
As I haven't seen a Reviewed-By for the rest of the patches of this series.
Thanks,
-Liran
On 16/03/2020 12:28, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Fri, 13 Mar 2020
On Fri, 13 Mar 2020 16:50:08 +0200
Liran Alon wrote:
> Microsoft introduced this ACPI table to avoid Windows guests performing
> various workarounds for device erratas. As the virtual device emulated
> by VMM may not have the errata.
>
> Currently, WAET allows hypervisor to inform guest about
Microsoft introduced this ACPI table to avoid Windows guests performing
various workarounds for device erratas. As the virtual device emulated
by VMM may not have the errata.
Currently, WAET allows hypervisor to inform guest about two
specific behaviors: One for RTC and the other for ACPI PM
