On 28.04.20 09:23, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
>
>
> On 28.04.2020 09:16, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 27.04.20 21:26, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
>>>
>>> On 27.04.2020 15:35, Max Reitz wrote:
On 21.04.20 10:11, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
> zstd significantly reduces cluster compression time.
> It
On 28.04.2020 09:16, Max Reitz wrote:
On 27.04.20 21:26, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
On 27.04.2020 15:35, Max Reitz wrote:
On 21.04.20 10:11, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
zstd significantly reduces cluster compression time.
It provides better compression performance maintaining
the same level of the
On 27.04.20 21:26, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
>
>
> On 27.04.2020 15:35, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 21.04.20 10:11, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
>>> zstd significantly reduces cluster compression time.
>>> It provides better compression performance maintaining
>>> the same level of the compression ratio in
On 27.04.2020 15:35, Max Reitz wrote:
On 21.04.20 10:11, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
zstd significantly reduces cluster compression time.
It provides better compression performance maintaining
the same level of the compression ratio in comparison with
zlib, which, at the moment, is the only
On 21.04.20 10:11, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
> zstd significantly reduces cluster compression time.
> It provides better compression performance maintaining
> the same level of the compression ratio in comparison with
> zlib, which, at the moment, is the only compression
> method available.
>
> The
zstd significantly reduces cluster compression time.
It provides better compression performance maintaining
the same level of the compression ratio in comparison with
zlib, which, at the moment, is the only compression
method available.
The performance test results:
Test compresses and
