Thomas Huth writes:
> On 22/10/2019 15.48, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>
>> Max Reitz writes:
>>
>>> On 22.10.19 15:11, Alex Bennée wrote:
Thomas Huth writes:
> As discussed here:
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-10/msg00697.html
>
> and
On 22/10/2019 15.48, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Max Reitz writes:
>
>> On 22.10.19 15:11, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>>
>>> Thomas Huth writes:
>>>
As discussed here:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-10/msg00697.html
and here:
On 22.10.19 15:11, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Thomas Huth writes:
>
>> As discussed here:
>>
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-10/msg00697.html
>>
>> and here:
>>
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-10/msg01388.html
>
> Queued to testing/next, thanks.
It
Max Reitz writes:
> On 22.10.19 15:11, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>
>> Thomas Huth writes:
>>
>>> As discussed here:
>>>
>>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-10/msg00697.html
>>>
>>> and here:
>>>
>>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-10/msg01388.html
>>
>>
Thomas Huth writes:
> As discussed here:
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-10/msg00697.html
>
> and here:
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-10/msg01388.html
Queued to testing/next, thanks.
>
> it would be good to have some more valuable iotests
Thomas Huth writes:
> On 22/10/2019 13.39, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>
>> Thomas Huth writes:
>>
>>> On 22/10/2019 09.21, Thomas Huth wrote:
As discussed here:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-10/msg00697.html
and here:
On 22/10/2019 13.39, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Thomas Huth writes:
>
>> On 22/10/2019 09.21, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> As discussed here:
>>>
>>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-10/msg00697.html
>>>
>>> and here:
>>>
>>>
Thomas Huth writes:
> On 22/10/2019 09.21, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> As discussed here:
>>
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-10/msg00697.html
>>
>> and here:
>>
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-10/msg01388.html
>>
>> it would be good to have some more
On 22/10/2019 09.21, Thomas Huth wrote:
> As discussed here:
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-10/msg00697.html
>
> and here:
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-10/msg01388.html
>
> it would be good to have some more valuable iotests enabled in the
>
As discussed here:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-10/msg00697.html
and here:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-10/msg01388.html
it would be good to have some more valuable iotests enabled in the
"auto" group to get better iotest coverage during "make
10 matches
Mail list logo