Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] tests/migration: fix a typo in comment
On 04/10/2019 05.43, Mao Zhongyi wrote: > Signed-off-by: Mao Zhongyi > Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée > Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier > --- > tests/migration/stress.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tests/migration/stress.c b/tests/migration/stress.c > index 9e128eef50..debf34359f 100644 > --- a/tests/migration/stress.c > +++ b/tests/migration/stress.c > @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ static int stressone(unsigned long long ramsizeMB) > > /* We don't care about initial state, but we do want > * to fault it all into RAM, otherwise the first iter > - * of the loop below will be quite slow. We cna't use > + * of the loop below will be quite slow. We can't use > * 0x0 as the byte as gcc optimizes that away into a > * calloc instead :-) */ > memset(ram, 0xfe, ramsizeMB * 1024 * 1024); > Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth
[PATCH v3 2/3] tests/migration: fix a typo in comment
Signed-off-by: Mao Zhongyi Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier --- tests/migration/stress.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tests/migration/stress.c b/tests/migration/stress.c index 9e128eef50..debf34359f 100644 --- a/tests/migration/stress.c +++ b/tests/migration/stress.c @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ static int stressone(unsigned long long ramsizeMB) /* We don't care about initial state, but we do want * to fault it all into RAM, otherwise the first iter - * of the loop below will be quite slow. We cna't use + * of the loop below will be quite slow. We can't use * 0x0 as the byte as gcc optimizes that away into a * calloc instead :-) */ memset(ram, 0xfe, ramsizeMB * 1024 * 1024); -- 2.17.1
