On 9/11/21 3:31 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 9/3/21 11:11 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 9/3/21 10:42 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 9/3/21 2:50 AM, David Gibson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 06:15:34PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Each POWER cpu has its own
On 9/3/21 11:11 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 9/3/21 10:42 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> On 9/3/21 2:50 AM, David Gibson wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 06:15:34PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Each POWER cpu has its own has_work() implementation. Instead of
On 9/3/21 10:42 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 9/3/21 2:50 AM, David Gibson wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 06:15:34PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>> Each POWER cpu has its own has_work() implementation. Instead of
>>> overloading CPUClass on each PowerPCCPUClass init, register the
On 9/3/21 2:50 AM, David Gibson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 06:15:34PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Each POWER cpu has its own has_work() implementation. Instead of
overloading CPUClass on each PowerPCCPUClass init, register the
generic ppc_cpu_has_work() handler, and have it call
On 9/3/21 2:50 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 06:15:34PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> Each POWER cpu has its own has_work() implementation. Instead of
>> overloading CPUClass on each PowerPCCPUClass init, register the
>> generic ppc_cpu_has_work() handler, and have it
On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 06:15:34PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Each POWER cpu has its own has_work() implementation. Instead of
> overloading CPUClass on each PowerPCCPUClass init, register the
> generic ppc_cpu_has_work() handler, and have it call the POWER
> specific has_work().
I
Each POWER cpu has its own has_work() implementation. Instead of
overloading CPUClass on each PowerPCCPUClass init, register the
generic ppc_cpu_has_work() handler, and have it call the POWER
specific has_work().
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
---
target/ppc/cpu-qom.h | 3 +++
