* Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Remove the mask in the call to ram_release_pages(). Nothing else does
> it, and if the offset has that bits set, we have a lot of trouble.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela
Yeh same as in the other branch
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert
> ---
> migration/ram.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
> index 881fe4974e..fa49d22e69 100644
> --- a/migration/ram.c
> +++ b/migration/ram.c
> @@ -1340,7 +1340,7 @@ static bool do_compress_ram_page(QEMUFile *f, z_stream
> *stream, RAMBlock *block,
> ram_addr_t offset, uint8_t *source_buf)
> {
> RAMState *rs = ram_state;
> -uint8_t *p = block->host + (offset & TARGET_PAGE_MASK);
> +uint8_t *p = block->host + offset;
> bool zero_page = false;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -1365,7 +1365,7 @@ static bool do_compress_ram_page(QEMUFile *f, z_stream
> *stream, RAMBlock *block,
> }
>
> exit:
> -ram_release_page(block->idstr, offset & TARGET_PAGE_MASK);
> +ram_release_page(block->idstr, offset);
> return zero_page;
> }
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
