On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 8:03 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 09:14:55AM +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 12:41 AM Bin Meng wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 6:20 PM Bin Meng wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Bin Meng
> > > >
> >
On 19/10/22 12:20, Bin Meng wrote:
From: Bin Meng
The maximum number of wait objects for win32 should be
MAXIMUM_WAIT_OBJECTS, not MAXIMUM_WAIT_OBJECTS + 1.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng
---
Changes in v4:
- make the out of bounds access protection explicit
Changes in v3:
- move the check of
On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 09:14:55AM +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 12:41 AM Bin Meng wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 6:20 PM Bin Meng wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Bin Meng
> > >
> > > The maximum number of wait objects for win32 should be
> > >
Hi Daniel,
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 12:41 AM Bin Meng wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 6:20 PM Bin Meng wrote:
> >
> > From: Bin Meng
> >
> > The maximum number of wait objects for win32 should be
> > MAXIMUM_WAIT_OBJECTS, not MAXIMUM_WAIT_OBJECTS + 1.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bin Meng
> > ---
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 6:20 PM Bin Meng wrote:
>
> From: Bin Meng
>
> The maximum number of wait objects for win32 should be
> MAXIMUM_WAIT_OBJECTS, not MAXIMUM_WAIT_OBJECTS + 1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bin Meng
> ---
>
> Changes in v4:
> - make the out of bounds access protection explicit
>
>
From: Bin Meng
The maximum number of wait objects for win32 should be
MAXIMUM_WAIT_OBJECTS, not MAXIMUM_WAIT_OBJECTS + 1.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng
---
Changes in v4:
- make the out of bounds access protection explicit
Changes in v3:
- move the check of adding the same HANDLE twice to a
