On Fri, Aug 5, 2022 at 2:29 AM Eugenio Pérez wrote:
>
> It was easier to allow vhost_svq_add to handle the memory. Now that we
> will allow qemu to add elements to a SVQ without the guest's knowledge,
> it's better to handle it in the caller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eugenio Pérez
Acked-by: Jason
It was easier to allow vhost_svq_add to handle the memory. Now that we
will allow qemu to add elements to a SVQ without the guest's knowledge,
it's better to handle it in the caller.
Signed-off-by: Eugenio Pérez
---
hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c | 10 --
1 file changed, 4
