On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 3:29 AM BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2023, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Jan 2023, Howard Spoelstra wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 9:57 PM BALATON Zoltan
> wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 26 Jan 2023, Howard Spoelstra wrote:
> Mac OS X
> #10.0 bus1
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jan 2023, Howard Spoelstra wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 9:57 PM BALATON Zoltan wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jan 2023, Howard Spoelstra wrote:
Mac OS X
#10.0 bus1 mouse: usb_ohci_stop pci-ohci: USB Suspended. Reverts to adb
mouse. No recognition as
On Thu, 26 Jan 2023, Howard Spoelstra wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 9:57 PM BALATON Zoltan wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jan 2023, Howard Spoelstra wrote:
Mac OS X
#10.0 bus1 mouse: usb_ohci_stop pci-ohci: USB Suspended. Reverts to adb
mouse. No recognition as HID device.
#10.0 bus2 kbd: usb_ohci_stop
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 9:57 PM BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2023, Howard Spoelstra wrote:
> > Mac OS X
> > #10.0 bus1 mouse: usb_ohci_stop pci-ohci: USB Suspended. Reverts to adb
> > mouse. No recognition as HID device.
> > #10.0 bus2 kbd: usb_ohci_stop pci-ohci: USB Suspended. Up to
On Thu, 26 Jan 2023, Howard Spoelstra wrote:
Mac OS X
#10.0 bus1 mouse: usb_ohci_stop pci-ohci: USB Suspended. Reverts to adb
mouse. No recognition as HID device.
#10.0 bus2 kbd: usb_ohci_stop pci-ohci: USB Suspended. Up to that point kbd
pcap shows normal interrupt operation and recognition as
On Thu, 26 Jan 2023, Howard Spoelstra wrote:
I tested all Mac OS/OSX available to me with mouse and kbd alternately
connected to usb-bus1 or usb-bus2.
./qemu-system-ppc \
-M mac99,usb=off \
-L pc-bios \
-boot c \
-prom-env "auto-boot?=true" \
-display gtk -monitor stdio \
-drive
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 4:33 PM BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2023, Howard Spoelstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 3:15 PM BALATON Zoltan
> wrote:
> >> I thought MacOS 8 needed old world ROM but looks like it can also load
> it
> >> from disk on new world machines. Then what
> On Jan 4, 2023, at 2:59 PM, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
>
> Setting emulated machine type with a property called "via" is
> confusing users so deprecate the "via" option in favour of newly added
> explicit machine types. The default via=cuda option is not a valid
> config (no real Mac has this
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023, Howard Spoelstra wrote:
My 2 cents about naming:
It seems less important how the machines are named when their name is not
covering their definition. F.i. the powermac3,1 never had adb, could not be
equipped with a G3 cpu, did not run at 900Mhz.
True it never had ADB and
On Tue, 24 Jan 2023, Howard Spoelstra wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 3:15 PM BALATON Zoltan wrote:
I thought MacOS 8 needed old world ROM but looks like it can also load it
from disk on new world machines. Then what version of the ROM it has?
It seems there was some change at ROM 5.2.1 then
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 3:15 PM BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2023, Howard Spoelstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 2:49 AM BALATON Zoltan
> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 24 Jan 2023, Howard Spoelstra wrote:
> >>> From a Mac OS guest perspective, via=cuda is needed for Mac OS 9.0.4
> due
>
On Tue, 24 Jan 2023, Howard Spoelstra wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 2:49 AM BALATON Zoltan wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2023, Howard Spoelstra wrote:
From a Mac OS guest perspective, via=cuda is needed for Mac OS 9.0.4 due
to
the 2 usb devices (mouse/kbd) issue. And for 10.0/10.1 (my guess would
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 2:49 AM BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2023, Howard Spoelstra wrote:
> > From a Mac OS guest perspective, via=cuda is needed for Mac OS 9.0.4 due
> to
> > the 2 usb devices (mouse/kbd) issue. And for 10.0/10.1 (my guess would be
> > that these suffer the same usb
On Tue, 24 Jan 2023, Howard Spoelstra wrote:
From a Mac OS guest perspective, via=cuda is needed for Mac OS 9.0.4 due to
the 2 usb devices (mouse/kbd) issue. And for 10.0/10.1 (my guess would be
that these suffer the same usb issue)
The real powermac3,1 AGP has no adb.
And do these OSes run on
On Mon, 23 Jan 2023, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
On 22/01/2023 22:07, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jan 2023, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
On 12/01/2023 23:51, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023, Howard Spoelstra wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 1:15 AM BALATON Zoltan
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 11:06 PM Mark Cave-Ayland <
mark.cave-ayl...@ilande.co.uk> wrote:
> On 22/01/2023 22:07, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 22 Jan 2023, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> >> On 12/01/2023 23:51, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 12 Jan 2023, Howard Spoelstra wrote:
> On
On 22/01/2023 22:07, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jan 2023, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
On 12/01/2023 23:51, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023, Howard Spoelstra wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 1:15 AM BALATON Zoltan wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
On 04/01/2023
On Sun, 22 Jan 2023, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
On 12/01/2023 23:51, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023, Howard Spoelstra wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 1:15 AM BALATON Zoltan wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
On 04/01/2023 21:59, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
Setting
On 12/01/2023 23:51, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023, Howard Spoelstra wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 1:15 AM BALATON Zoltan wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
On 04/01/2023 21:59, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
Setting emulated machine type with a property called "via"
On Fri, 13 Jan 2023, Howard Spoelstra wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 12:53 AM BALATON Zoltan wrote:
The names also show what we intend to
emulate even though the emulation may not be complete or have bugs (this
is also true for other machines in QEMU where a lot of them are not fully
emulated,
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 12:53 AM BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2023, Howard Spoelstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 1:15 AM BALATON Zoltan
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 10 Jan 2023, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> >>> On 04/01/2023 21:59, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> >>>
> Setting emulated
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023, Howard Spoelstra wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 1:15 AM BALATON Zoltan wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
On 04/01/2023 21:59, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
Setting emulated machine type with a property called "via" is
confusing users so deprecate the "via"
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 1:15 AM BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2023, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> > On 04/01/2023 21:59, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> >
> >> Setting emulated machine type with a property called "via" is
> >> confusing users so deprecate the "via" option in favour of newly added
>
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
On 04/01/2023 21:59, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
Setting emulated machine type with a property called "via" is
confusing users so deprecate the "via" option in favour of newly added
explicit machine types. The default via=cuda option is not a valid
config
On 04/01/2023 21:59, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
Setting emulated machine type with a property called "via" is
confusing users so deprecate the "via" option in favour of newly added
explicit machine types. The default via=cuda option is not a valid
config (no real Mac has this combination of
On 4/1/23 22:59, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
Setting emulated machine type with a property called "via" is
confusing users so deprecate the "via" option in favour of newly added
explicit machine types. The default via=cuda option is not a valid
config (no real Mac has this combination of hardware) so
Setting emulated machine type with a property called "via" is
confusing users so deprecate the "via" option in favour of newly added
explicit machine types. The default via=cuda option is not a valid
config (no real Mac has this combination of hardware) so no machine
type could be defined for that
27 matches
Mail list logo
