On 03/08/2010 06:58 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
Signed-off-by: Paul Bollepebo...@tiscali.nl
Applied. Thanks.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
---
usb-linux.c |3 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/usb-linux.c b/usb-linux.c
index a9c15c6..23155dd 100644
---
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 10:59 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/08/2010 06:58 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
Signed-off-by: Paul Bollepebo...@tiscali.nl
Applied. Thanks.
Paul Brook was tempted to replace it by an abort() (about one and a
half week ago). Did you perhaps miss that message or
On 03/17/2010 11:14 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 10:59 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/08/2010 06:58 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
Signed-off-by: Paul Bollepebo...@tiscali.nl
Applied. Thanks.
Paul Brook was tempted to replace it by an abort() (about one
On 03/17/2010 11:14 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 10:59 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/08/2010 06:58 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
Signed-off-by: Paul Bollepebo...@tiscali.nl
Applied. Thanks.
Paul Brook was tempted to replace it by an abort() (about one and a
half week
On 03/17/2010 12:08 PM, Paul Brook wrote:
On 03/17/2010 11:14 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 10:59 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/08/2010 06:58 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
Signed-off-by: Paul Bollepebo...@tiscali.nl
Applied. Thanks.
If something should never happen (as in this case) then an abort/assert
is completely appropriate. Once things get that screwed up there's no
right answer, and the best thing we can do is terminate immediately to
try and avoid further damage.
This case was:
switch (foo 0x03) {
case
On 3/17/10, Paul Brook p...@codesourcery.com wrote:
If something should never happen (as in this case) then an abort/assert
is completely appropriate. Once things get that screwed up there's no
right answer, and the best thing we can do is terminate immediately to
try and avoid
On 03/17/2010 03:15 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On 3/17/10, Paul Brookp...@codesourcery.com wrote:
If something should never happen (as in this case) then an abort/assert
is completely appropriate. Once things get that screwed up there's no
right answer, and the best thing
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 15:41 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/17/2010 03:15 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
This breaks build (gcc 4.3.2):
CCusb-linux.o
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/src/qemu/usb-linux.c: In function 'usb_linux_update_endp_table':
/src/qemu/usb-linux.c:759:
On 03/17/2010 03:56 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 15:41 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/17/2010 03:15 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
This breaks build (gcc 4.3.2):
CCusb-linux.o
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/src/qemu/usb-linux.c: In function
On 3/17/10, Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 03/17/2010 03:56 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 15:41 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/17/2010 03:15 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
This breaks build (gcc 4.3.2):
CCusb-linux.o
cc1: warnings
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl
---
usb-linux.c |3 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/usb-linux.c b/usb-linux.c
index a9c15c6..23155dd 100644
--- a/usb-linux.c
+++ b/usb-linux.c
@@ -846,9 +846,6 @@ static int
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl
---
usb-linux.c |3 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/usb-linux.c b/usb-linux.c
index a9c15c6..23155dd 100644
--- a/usb-linux.c
+++ b/usb-linux.c
@@ -846,9 +846,6 @@ static int
13 matches
Mail list logo
