Currently, x86_64-softmmu qemu segfaults when trying to use 4095M memsize.
This patch adds a simple check and error message (much like the 2047 limit on
32-bit hosts) on ram_size in the control path after we determine we're
not using kvm
Upstream qemu-kvm is affected if using the -no-kvm option;
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 03:34:34PM -0600, Ryan Harper wrote:
* Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net [2010-03-04 15:27]:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 06:02:15PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Ryan Harper a écrit :
Currently, x86_64-softmmu qemu segfaults when trying to use 4095M
memsize.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 06:02:15PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Ryan Harper a écrit :
Currently, x86_64-softmmu qemu segfaults when trying to use 4095M memsize.
This patch adds a simple check and error message (much like the 2047 limit
on
32-bit hosts) on ram_size in the control path
* Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net [2010-03-04 15:27]:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 06:02:15PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Ryan Harper a écrit :
Currently, x86_64-softmmu qemu segfaults when trying to use 4095M
memsize.
This patch adds a simple check and error message (much like the
Currently, x86_64-softmmu qemu segfaults when trying to use 4095M memsize.
This patch adds a simple check and error message (much like the 2047 limit on
32-bit hosts) on ram_size in the control path after we determine we're
not using kvm
Upstream qemu-kvm is affected if using the -no-kvm option;
Ryan Harper a écrit :
Currently, x86_64-softmmu qemu segfaults when trying to use 4095M memsize.
This patch adds a simple check and error message (much like the 2047 limit on
32-bit hosts) on ram_size in the control path after we determine we're
not using kvm
Upstream qemu-kvm is affected
On 23.02.2010, at 18:02, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Ryan Harper a écrit :
Currently, x86_64-softmmu qemu segfaults when trying to use 4095M memsize.
This patch adds a simple check and error message (much like the 2047 limit on
32-bit hosts) on ram_size in the control path after we determine
On 02/23/2010 02:30 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 23.02.2010, at 18:02, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Ryan Harper a écrit :
Currently, x86_64-softmmu qemu segfaults when trying to use 4095M memsize.
This patch adds a simple check and error message (much like the 2047 limit on
32-bit hosts)
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 03:07:20PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/23/2010 02:30 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 23.02.2010, at 18:02, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Ryan Harper a écrit :
Currently, x86_64-softmmu qemu segfaults when trying to use 4095M
memsize.
This patch adds a simple check
* Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net [2010-02-23 11:37]:
Ryan Harper a écrit :
Currently, x86_64-softmmu qemu segfaults when trying to use 4095M memsize.
This patch adds a simple check and error message (much like the 2047 limit
on
32-bit hosts) on ram_size in the control path after we
10 matches
Mail list logo