On 17/03/07, andrzej zaborowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 17/03/07, Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 16 March 2007 22:06, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> > This patch contains some ugly but very useful chnages:
> > - in cpu-exec.c, halt the arm CPU on CPU_INTERRUPT_HALT like in
On 17/03/07, Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 16 March 2007 22:06, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> This patch contains some ugly but very useful chnages:
> - in cpu-exec.c, halt the arm CPU on CPU_INTERRUPT_HALT like in other
> architectures.
This is ok. Though I'd prefer it to actua
On Friday 16 March 2007 22:06, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> This patch contains some ugly but very useful chnages:
> - in cpu-exec.c, halt the arm CPU on CPU_INTERRUPT_HALT like in other
> architectures.
This is ok. Though I'd prefer it to actually be common code (like
CPU_INTERRUPT_DEBUG).
> -
This patch contains some ugly but very useful chnages:
- in cpu-exec.c, halt the arm CPU on CPU_INTERRUPT_HALT like in other
architectures.
- wake the cpu up on CPU_INTERRUPT_EXITTB - this serves waking the
CPU up without asserting IRQ or FIQ, which is possible on PXA. Would
it be better to add a