On 18 September 2018 at 15:34, Programmingkid wrote:
> On Sep 17, 2018, at 7:46 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> See my previous email -- the spec suggests that "round" is
>> "inexact but not overflow".
>
> I couldn't find anything in my pdf document about round being defined as
> inexact but not
> On Sep 17, 2018, at 7:46 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> On 18 September 2018 at 00:18, Programmingkid
> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sep 17, 2018, at 5:25 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>>
>>> On 17 September 2018 at 22:18, John Arbuckle
>>> wrote:
On 18 September 2018 at 00:18, Programmingkid wrote:
>
>> On Sep 17, 2018, at 5:25 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>
>> On 17 September 2018 at 22:18, John Arbuckle
>> wrote:
>>> https://www.nxp.com/files-static/product/doc/MPCFPE32B.pdf
>>> Page 2-8 in table 2-4 is where the description of this bit
> On Sep 17, 2018, at 5:25 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> On 17 September 2018 at 22:18, John Arbuckle
> wrote:
>> https://www.nxp.com/files-static/product/doc/MPCFPE32B.pdf
>> Page 2-8 in table 2-4 is where the description of this bit can be found.
>>
>> It is described as:
>>
>>
On 17 September 2018 at 22:18, John Arbuckle wrote:
> https://www.nxp.com/files-static/product/doc/MPCFPE32B.pdf
> Page 2-8 in table 2-4 is where the description of this bit can be found.
>
> It is described as:
>
> Floating-point fraction rounded. The last arithmetic, rounding, or conversion
>
https://www.nxp.com/files-static/product/doc/MPCFPE32B.pdf
Page 2-8 in table 2-4 is where the description of this bit can be found.
It is described as:
Floating-point fraction rounded. The last arithmetic, rounding, or conversion
instruction incremented the fraction. This bit is NOT sticky.
