On 10/10/10 13:12, Alon Levy wrote:
- Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
How is this different than usb_del? Is it that it detaches it but
does
not delete the device?
yes. There is no usb_attach command because it was harder to write (can't
use the bus.addr since a detached
- Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/10/10 13:12, Alon Levy wrote:
- Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
How is this different than usb_del? Is it that it detaches it but
does
not delete the device?
yes. There is no usb_attach command because it was
- Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
How is this different than usb_del? Is it that it detaches it but
does
not delete the device?
yes. There is no usb_attach command because it was harder to write (can't
use the bus.addr since a detached device doesn't have them) and I
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:40:29 +0200
Alon Levy al...@redhat.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Alon Levy al...@redhat.com
This needs to be rebased as it now conflicts with my last series merged
on master.
I have some minor comments (below), but in general seems ok to me. However,
I'd like to get an ACK
How is this different than usb_del? Is it that it detaches it but does
not delete the device?
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
On 10/05/2010 09:40 AM, Alon Levy wrote:
Signed-off-by: Alon Levyal...@redhat.com
---
qemu-monitor.hx | 17 +
sysemu.h|1 +
vl.c
Signed-off-by: Alon Levy al...@redhat.com
---
qemu-monitor.hx | 17 +
sysemu.h|1 +
vl.c| 41 +
3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/qemu-monitor.hx b/qemu-monitor.hx
index
