On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:48:04PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> If the host has both KVM PR and KVM HV loaded and we pass:
>
> -machine pseries,accel=kvm,kvm-type=PR
>
> the kvmppc_is_pr() returns false instead of true. Since the helper
> is mostly used as fallback, it doesn't have any real
On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 13:17:48 +0200
Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 14.09.2017 12:48, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > If the host has both KVM PR and KVM HV loaded and we pass:
> >
> > -machine pseries,accel=kvm,kvm-type=PR
> >
> > the kvmppc_is_pr() returns false instead of true. Since the
On 14.09.2017 12:48, Greg Kurz wrote:
> If the host has both KVM PR and KVM HV loaded and we pass:
>
> -machine pseries,accel=kvm,kvm-type=PR
>
> the kvmppc_is_pr() returns false instead of true. Since the helper
> is mostly used as fallback, it doesn't have any real impact with
> recent
On 14.09.2017 12:48, Greg Kurz wrote:
> If the host has both KVM PR and KVM HV loaded and we pass:
>
> -machine pseries,accel=kvm,kvm-type=PR
>
> the kvmppc_is_pr() returns false instead of true. Since the helper
> is mostly used as fallback, it doesn't have any real impact with
> recent
If the host has both KVM PR and KVM HV loaded and we pass:
-machine pseries,accel=kvm,kvm-type=PR
the kvmppc_is_pr() returns false instead of true. Since the helper
is mostly used as fallback, it doesn't have any real impact with
recent kernels. A notable exception is the workaround to