On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 01:11:25PM -0700, Bruce Rogers wrote:
The second parameter to qapi_dealloc_type_size should be a uint64_t *,
not a size_t *. This was causing our 32 bit x86 build to fail, since
warnings are treated as errors.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Rogers brog...@suse.com
---
The second parameter to qapi_dealloc_type_size should be a uint64_t *,
not a size_t *. This was causing our 32 bit x86 build to fail, since
warnings are treated as errors.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Rogers brog...@suse.com
---
qapi/qapi-dealloc-visitor.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 01:11:25PM -0700, Bruce Rogers wrote:
The second parameter to qapi_dealloc_type_size should be a uint64_t *,
not a size_t *. This was causing our 32 bit x86 build to fail, since
warnings are treated as errors.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Rogers brog...@suse.com
Doh, I
Am 27.11.2012 21:54, schrieb mdroth:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 01:11:25PM -0700, Bruce Rogers wrote:
The second parameter to qapi_dealloc_type_size should be a uint64_t *,
not a size_t *. This was causing our 32 bit x86 build to fail, since
warnings are treated as errors.
Signed-off-by: Bruce
