Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org writes:
On 5 March 2013 04:16, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 04/03/2013 18:58, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
Mass-mark these devices as no_user.
There is no such thing as a 'no-user' device -- Anthony
On 7 March 2013 16:48, Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com wrote:
Can we make some progress towards something that makes more sense?
First step: reasons for marking a device no_user.
From a user point of view, I think there's just one: -device/device_add
cannot possibly result in a working
Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org writes:
On 7 March 2013 16:48, Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com wrote:
Can we make some progress towards something that makes more sense?
First step: reasons for marking a device no_user.
From a user point of view, I think there's just one:
On 7 March 2013 20:45, Peter Crosthwaite peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com wrote:
Case four: we really don't expect anybody to be trying to wire this
up dynamically, which would apply to things like the on-cpu peripherals
for some ARM cores.
What ARM cores were you thinking here exactly? We are
Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com writes:
Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org writes:
[and I don't think this device
can be added via the monitor but not the command line
counts as consistent or coherent...]
no_user applies equally to -device and device_add.
On 8 March 2013 00:09, Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com wrote:
What is -devices help trying to show? Devices that are valid to for a
user to pass? Hint: on a PC, the only thing that's valid to add are
devices that implement a certain bus type. In fact, it depends on the
bus model.
Yeah,
Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com writes:
Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com writes:
Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org writes:
[and I don't think this device
can be added via the monitor but not the command line
counts as consistent or coherent...]
no_user
Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com writes:
Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com writes:
Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com writes:
Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org writes:
[and I don't think this device
can be added via the monitor but not the command line
Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com writes:
Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com writes:
Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com writes:
Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com writes:
Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org writes:
[and I don't think this device
can be
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 1:41 AM, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 7 March 2013 20:45, Peter Crosthwaite peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com wrote:
Case four: we really don't expect anybody to be trying to wire this
up dynamically, which would apply to things like the on-cpu peripherals
On 8 March 2013 07:37, Peter Crosthwaite peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com wrote:
Its all out of tree using out device tree driven machine instantiation
but we are toying with the idea of moving away from that in favour of
-device and friends (2100 less lines out of tree code for me), once
the
Il 05/03/2013 00:22, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
Yes, the right thing to do would be to QOMify memory regions and
introduce pins, but that's a bit more than the amount of time I have now
for this.
...plus it means that when we do have these things we
have to go round and identify the cases
On 03/05/13 11:58, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 05/03/2013 00:22, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
Yes, the right thing to do would be to QOMify memory regions and
introduce pins, but that's a bit more than the amount of time I have now
for this.
...plus it means that when we do have these things we
These features require creating the device specially from board
code. Therefore, devices that use it cannot be created with
-device. (And some of them are even visible in binaries for
qemu-system-x86_64, for example the sysbus EHCI device).
Mass-mark these devices as no_user.
Signed-off-by:
On 5 March 2013 01:32, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
These features require creating the device specially from board
code. Therefore, devices that use it cannot be created with
-device. (And some of them are even visible in binaries for
qemu-system-x86_64, for example the sysbus
Il 04/03/2013 18:58, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
Mass-mark these devices as no_user.
There is no such thing as a 'no-user' device -- Anthony
(http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2013-01/msg00896.html)
We should figure out what we might be trying to use 'no-user'
for, and
On 5 March 2013 04:16, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 04/03/2013 18:58, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
Mass-mark these devices as no_user.
There is no such thing as a 'no-user' device -- Anthony
(http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2013-01/msg00896.html)
We should figure
17 matches
Mail list logo
