Reviewed-by: liguang lig.f...@cn.fujitsu.com
在 2013-06-03一的 18:23 +0200,Igor Mammedov写道:
spotted by Coverity,
x86_reg_info_32[] is CPU_NB_REGS32 elements long, so accessing
x86_reg_info_32[CPU_NB_REGS32] will be one element off array.
Yes, it will.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov
Am 03.06.2013 18:23, schrieb Igor Mammedov:
spotted by Coverity,
x86_reg_info_32[] is CPU_NB_REGS32 elements long, so accessing
x86_reg_info_32[CPU_NB_REGS32] will be one element off array.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov imamm...@redhat.com
---
target-i386/cpu.c |2 +-
1 files changed,
spotted by Coverity,
x86_reg_info_32[] is CPU_NB_REGS32 elements long, so accessing
x86_reg_info_32[CPU_NB_REGS32] will be one element off array.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov imamm...@redhat.com
---
target-i386/cpu.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
On 06/03/2013 11:23 AM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
spotted by Coverity,
x86_reg_info_32[] is CPU_NB_REGS32 elements long, so accessing
x86_reg_info_32[CPU_NB_REGS32] will be one element off array.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov imamm...@redhat.com
---
target-i386/cpu.c |2 +-
1 files