Hi Philippe,
Thanks for reviewing my patch. Yes I though about it, a specific header file
with only several lines seems not worth it, but otherwise I would have to
define redundant macro in vmmouse.c. Currently rebundant macro is ok
but if we need some more macros, we would end on creating a spec
Hi Zihan Yang,
On 03/07/2018 01:55 PM, Zihan Yang wrote:
> Hi all, this is a bitesized patch from me a while ago, it seems a little
> old but I wonder if there is any opinion about it? Is it still valid?
For a single TYPE use, I'm not sure use a specific header is useful
(patch #1).
The 2nd patc
Hi all, this is a bitesized patch from me a while ago, it seems a little
old but I wonder if there is any opinion about it? Is it still valid?
Thanks.
2018-02-04 15:28 GMT+08:00 Zihan Yang :
> The ps2_mouse property of vmmouse is still pointer type which
> is defined by DEFINE_PROP_PTR. But qde
The ps2_mouse property of vmmouse is still pointer type which
is defined by DEFINE_PROP_PTR. But qdev pointer property should
be avoided according to qdev-properties.h. Convert it to
QOM link relationship.
It involves two patches because it requires the TYPE_I8042
macro which is defined in anothe
