On 03/26/2012 07:29 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/26/2012 10:54 AM, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 02:20:24PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
I'm also sure we will have to refactor the merge significantly again
for
the introduction of additional chipsets and PC boards. But unless
On 03/27/2012 05:31 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
I think the better approach is to have a PCNorthBridge base-class that
contains functionality like PAM/SRAM that both I440FX and Q35 inherit
from.
I hate to transform this into a languagey discussion, but I don't think
inheritance is the right thing
On 03/27/2012 03:52 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/27/2012 05:31 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
I think the better approach is to have a PCNorthBridge base-class that
contains functionality like PAM/SRAM that both I440FX and Q35 inherit
from.
I hate to transform this into a languagey discussion,
On 2012-03-26 04:06, Wanpeng Li wrote:
From: Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com
This series aggressively refactors the PC machine initialization to be more
modelled and less ad-hoc. The highlights of this series are:
1) Things like -m and -bios-name are now device model properties
Am 26.03.2012 04:06, schrieb Wanpeng Li:
From: Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com
Resending an old cover letter is not a good idea. This looks like a v2,
so please mark it as such in the subjects; it's missing a Change Log
against Anthony's version. I take it, some patches were dropped?
This
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 02:47:19PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 26.03.2012 04:06, schrieb Wanpeng Li:
From: Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com
Resending an old cover letter is not a good idea. This looks like a v2,
so please mark it as such in the subjects; it's missing a Change Log
against
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 02:20:24PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
I'm also sure we will have to refactor the merge significantly again for
the introduction of additional chipsets and PC boards. But unless those
requirements can already be specified (Isaku?), that might be unavoidable.
Agreed. At
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 02:06, Wanpeng Li l...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
From: Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com
This series aggressively refactors the PC machine initialization to be more
modelled and less ad-hoc. The highlights of this series are:
Please fix coding style while moving.
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 12:20, Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com wrote:
On 2012-03-26 04:06, Wanpeng Li wrote:
From: Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com
This series aggressively refactors the PC machine initialization to be more
modelled and less ad-hoc. The highlights of this series are:
On 03/25/2012 09:06 PM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
From: Anthony Liguorialigu...@us.ibm.com
This series aggressively refactors the PC machine initialization to be more
modelled and less ad-hoc. The highlights of this series are:
1) Things like -m and -bios-name are now device model properties
2)
On 03/26/2012 10:54 AM, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 02:20:24PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
I'm also sure we will have to refactor the merge significantly again for
the introduction of additional chipsets and PC boards. But unless those
requirements can already be specified
On 03/26/2012 07:20 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-03-26 04:06, Wanpeng Li wrote:
From: Anthony Liguorialigu...@us.ibm.com
This series aggressively refactors the PC machine initialization to be more
modelled and less ad-hoc. The highlights of this series are:
1) Things like -m and
On 03/26/2012 12:09 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 02:06, Wanpeng Lil...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
From: Anthony Liguorialigu...@us.ibm.com
This series aggressively refactors the PC machine initialization to be more
modelled and less ad-hoc. The highlights of this series
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 17:35, Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 03/26/2012 12:09 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 02:06, Wanpeng Lil...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
From: Anthony Liguorialigu...@us.ibm.com
This series aggressively refactors the PC machine
On 03/26/2012 12:43 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 17:35, Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 03/26/2012 12:09 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 02:06, Wanpeng Lil...@linux.vnet.ibm.comwrote:
From: Anthony Liguorialigu...@us.ibm.com
This series
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 17:45, Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 03/26/2012 12:43 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 17:35, Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws
wrote:
On 03/26/2012 12:09 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 02:06, Wanpeng
On 03/26/2012 01:01 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 17:45, Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
Is this something we universally want to do? What would we do about patches
to audio?
I'd do it in cases when there is code movement, then git blame will
not be very useful
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 18:07, Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 03/26/2012 01:01 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 17:45, Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws
wrote:
Is this something we universally want to do? What would we do about
patches
to audio?
I'd
On 2012-03-26 19:33, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/26/2012 07:20 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-03-26 04:06, Wanpeng Li wrote:
From: Anthony Liguorialigu...@us.ibm.com
This series aggressively refactors the PC machine initialization to be more
modelled and less ad-hoc. The highlights of this
On 03/26/2012 02:30 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-03-26 19:33, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/26/2012 07:20 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-03-26 04:06, Wanpeng Li wrote:
From: Anthony Liguorialigu...@us.ibm.com
This series aggressively refactors the PC machine initialization to be more
On 2012-03-26 21:35, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/26/2012 02:30 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-03-26 19:33, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/26/2012 07:20 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-03-26 04:06, Wanpeng Li wrote:
From: Anthony Liguorialigu...@us.ibm.com
This series aggressively refactors the
On 03/26/2012 02:37 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-03-26 21:35, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Since this is an easily refactorable thing to look at later, I think
we should
start with extracting the types.
My worry is that those three refactorings set bad examples for others.
So I'd like to avoid
On 2012-03-26 21:39, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/26/2012 02:37 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-03-26 21:35, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Since this is an easily refactorable thing to look at later, I think
we should
start with extracting the types.
My worry is that those three refactorings set bad
On 03/26/2012 02:44 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-03-26 21:39, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/26/2012 02:37 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-03-26 21:35, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Since this is an easily refactorable thing to look at later, I think
we should
start with extracting the types.
My
On 03/26/2012 02:44 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-03-26 21:39, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/26/2012 02:37 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-03-26 21:35, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Since this is an easily refactorable thing to look at later, I think
we should
start with extracting the types.
My
On 2012-03-26 21:49, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/26/2012 02:44 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-03-26 21:39, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/26/2012 02:37 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-03-26 21:35, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Since this is an easily refactorable thing to look at later, I think
we
On 03/26/2012 03:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-03-26 21:49, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/26/2012 02:44 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
This would also mean that reference counting should be revisited
although with how dereferencing a parent affects the child.
It's not rocket science, but it's also
On 2012-03-26 22:13, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/26/2012 03:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-03-26 21:49, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/26/2012 02:44 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
This would also mean that reference counting should be revisited
although with how dereferencing a parent affects the
On 03/26/2012 03:30 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-03-26 22:13, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/26/2012 03:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-03-26 21:49, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/26/2012 02:44 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
This would also mean that reference counting should be revisited
although with
From: Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com
This series aggressively refactors the PC machine initialization to be more
modelled and less ad-hoc. The highlights of this series are:
1) Things like -m and -bios-name are now device model properties
2) The i440fx and piix3 are now modelled in a
30 matches
Mail list logo
