On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 03:47:39PM +0100, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> Whilst looking at implementing another DBDMA device for the Mac machines
> I noticed a couple of things: firstly there were some unused fields still
> in DBDMAState, and secondly the existing code still used global functions
> to
Whilst looking at implementing another DBDMA device for the Mac machines
I noticed a couple of things: firstly there were some unused fields still
in DBDMAState, and secondly the existing code still used global functions
to register DMA channels and handle the relationship between macio IDE and
