Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/10] ehci: various fixes

2012-11-15 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
On 11/14/12 17:21, Hans de Goede wrote: While working on moving usb-redir and usb-hid over to using async packet handling for their interrupt input endpoints. I've found and fixed quite a few ehci bugs. Unfortunately the moving to async for interrupt endpoints turns out to be a bad idea, as

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/10] ehci: various fixes

2012-11-15 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 11/15/2012 09:55 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: On 11/14/12 17:21, Hans de Goede wrote: While working on moving usb-redir and usb-hid over to using async packet handling for their interrupt input endpoints. I've found and fixed quite a few ehci bugs. Unfortunately the moving to async for

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/10] ehci: various fixes

2012-11-15 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
On 11/15/12 12:58, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 11/15/2012 09:55 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: On 11/14/12 17:21, Hans de Goede wrote: While working on moving usb-redir and usb-hid over to using async packet handling for their interrupt input endpoints. I've found and fixed quite a few ehci

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/10] ehci: various fixes

2012-11-15 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
Hi, Ok, so it looks like 1-3 are clear bugfixes which are needed in 1.3 Moving it forward in the patch-set will cause a conflict though, I'll go and do the reshuffle myself, throw in 2 usb-redir fixes and then send a new set Oh, and I've picked 1-3 already, no need to resend them.

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/10] ehci: various fixes

2012-11-14 Thread Hans de Goede
While working on moving usb-redir and usb-hid over to using async packet handling for their interrupt input endpoints. I've found and fixed quite a few ehci bugs. Unfortunately the moving to async for interrupt endpoints turns out to be a bad idea, as it causes issues for migration, an async