On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Mark Cave-Ayland
mark.cave-ayl...@ilande.co.uk wrote:
On 05/03/14 18:11, Richard Henderson wrote:
Rescued from a branch from September. I can't recall if I ever
actually posted these back then, so I'll wait a week before asking
for a pull.
Re-tested on
On 10/03/14 09:06, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
Hi Mark,
I think a better test case would be looking for regressions in
x86/x86-64 images. I'd suspect someone would launch QEMU on a SPARC
machine to emulate some other platform. (Solaris containers would be
more efficient for running SPARC on SPARC)
On 03/10/2014 02:19 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
On 10/03/14 09:06, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
Hi Mark,
I think a better test case would be looking for regressions in
x86/x86-64 images. I'd suspect someone would launch QEMU on a SPARC
machine to emulate some other platform. (Solaris containers
On 05/03/14 18:11, Richard Henderson wrote:
Rescued from a branch from September. I can't recall if I ever
actually posted these back then, so I'll wait a week before asking
for a pull.
Re-tested on v8plus. The machine doesn't have 64-bit libraries
installed, so I'm a bit stuck with that.
Rescued from a branch from September. I can't recall if I ever
actually posted these back then, so I'll wait a week before asking
for a pull.
Re-tested on v8plus. The machine doesn't have 64-bit libraries
installed, so I'm a bit stuck with that.
r~
Richard Henderson (11):
tcg-sparc: Fix
